Cited by 933D Modeling in Geospatial ApplicationsUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisAutomated Road and Building Extraction

Learning from urban form to predict building heights

Open access
Milojevic-Dupont, Nikola, Hans, Nicolai, Kaack, Lynn H., Zumwald, Marius, Andrieux, François, de Barros Soares, Daniel, Lohrey, Steffen, Pichler, Peter-Paul +1 more·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Understanding cities as complex systems, sustainable urban planning depends on reliable high-resolution data, for example of the building stock to upscale region-wide retrofit policies. For some cities and regions, these data exist in detailed 3D models based on real-world measurements. However, they are still expensive to build and maintain, a significant challenge, especially for small and medium-sized cities that are home to the majority of the European population. New methods are needed to estimate relevant building stock characteristics reliably and cost-effectively. Here, we present a machine learning based method for predicting building heights, which is based only on open-access geospatial data on urban form, such as building footprints and street networks. The method allows to predict building heights for regions where no dedicated 3D models exist currently. We train our model using building data from four European countries (France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Germany) and find that the morphology of the urban fabric surrounding a given building is highly predictive of the height of the building. A test on the German state of Brandenburg shows that our model predicts building heights with an average error well below the typical floor height (about 2.5 m), without having access to training data from Germany. Furthermore, we show that even a small amount of local height data obtained by citizens substantially improves the prediction accuracy. Our results illustrate the possibility of predicting missing data on urban infrastructure; they also underline the value of open government data and volunteered geographic information for scientific applications, such as contextual but scalable strategies to mitigate climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0242010

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Building heights can be predicted without elevation data from real estate records, census data and features characterizing the neighborhood of each building.

    “Recent research showed that heights can be predicted even without such elevation data, as demonstrated by [77,537], who predicted these from real estate records, census data and features characterizing the neighborhood of each building.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [537]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milojevic-Dupont, N., Hans, N., Kaack, L. H., Zumwald, M., Andrieux, F., de Barros Soares, D., Lohrey, S., Pichler, P.-P., & Creutzig, F.
Affiliations
  • Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Milojevic-Dupont, Nikola
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-12-09
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
e0242010
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111868370
Cited by
93
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 8
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Automated Road and Building Extraction
Keywords
urban form, building stock, urban morphology, building footprints, street networks, open geospatial data, volunteered geographic information, citizen data, 3D city model, climate change mitigation, sustainable urban planning, small and medium-sized cities
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Sustainable Development, Cities, City Planning, Europe, Forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review