Cited by 15Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesMathematics Education and Programs

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using e‐learning to support primary trainee teachers’ development of mathematical subject knowledge: An analysis of learning and the impact on confidence

Open access
Burgess, Hilary, Mayes, Ann Shelton·2008·Teacher Development

Abstract

This article explores the effectiveness of a mathematics subject knowledge development model that integrates conventional text‐based distance learning with an e‐learning coaching and peer group conferencing environment. The effectiveness of the model in supporting 194 trainee primary (pupil’s aged 5–11 years) teachers achievement of the subject knowledge standards required for qualified teacher status is evaluated and the impact of the model on trainee confidence is explored. Features of the model that trainees, tutors and post‐qualifiying teachers identify as critical factors for success are outlined and the relevance of the model for teacher professional development is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13664530701827731

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1080/0141192960220203 · DOI
  2. Ball D.L., 1988, For the Learning of Mathematics, 8, 40
  3. 10.1080/0267152032000048587 · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00137.x · DOI
  5. 10.1080/0141192022000015543 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/0141192990250303 · DOI
  7. Burgess, H. and Shelton Mayes, A. The role of new technologies in initial teacher education: A focus on developing subject knowledge in primary mathematics. Paper presented to conference at British Educational Research Association (BERA). September13–15. in Leeds
  8. 10.1080/1361126032000138337 · DOI
  9. 1998, Passport to mathematics, M521
  10. 10.1023/A:1003504816467 · DOI
  11. 1998, Teaching: High status, high sandards. Requirements for courses of initial teacher training. Circular 4/98
  12. 1998, The national literacy strategy: Framework for teaching
  13. 1999, Framework for teaching mathematics from reception to year 6
  14. 2002, Qualifying to teach: Professional standards for qualified teacher status and requirements for initial teacher training
  15. 2004, Clarke presses ahead with reform of mathematics education
  16. Edwards A., 1996, Mentoring and developing practice in primary school
  17. 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00020-1 · DOI
  18. Elbaz F., 1983, Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge
  19. Hackett G., 1999, Times Educational Supplement
  20. Hill L., 2000, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6, 23, 10.1080/135406000114735 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/03054980701451090 · DOI
  22. Joseph G.G., 2000, Crest of the Peacock: The Non‐European Roots of Mathematics
  23. Laurillard D., 1993, Journal of Educational Television, 19, 81, 10.1080/0260741930190204 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/0260747022000057927 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/0260747930190308 · DOI
  26. 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028401.51537.a5 · DOI
  27. 10.1023/A:1003177809664 · DOI
  28. Nias J., 1989, Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work
  29. 1999, Primary follow‐up survey of the training of trainees to teach reading and number (1996–98)
  30. 2001, Open University primary postgraduate certificate in education inspection report
  31. 2003, Quality of standards in primary initial teacher training: Inspected 1998–2002
  32. 1998, ITT inspection methodology
  33. Oldroyd D., 1991, Managing staff development: A handbook for secondary schools
  34. 2003, Watching and learning 3: Final report of the external evaluation of England’s national literacy and numeracy strategies
  35. Salmon G., 2003, E‐moderating: The key to teaching and learning on‐line
  36. 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00027-4 · DOI
  37. Burstein L., 1993, The IEA Study of Mathematics
  38. Skemp R.R., 1989, Mathematics in the primary school, 10.4324/9780203403891 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/1467-9604.00058 · DOI
  41. 2004, Postgraduate professional development (PPD)
  42. 2004, Flexible training routes
  43. Beaton A., 1996, Mathematical achievement in the middle years: IEA’s third international and science study
  44. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01072.x · DOI
  45. Wilcox B., 1993, Educational research and evaluation for policy and practice?, 81

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Burgess, H., & Mayes, A. S.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • University of Northampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Hilary
Venue
Teacher Development
Published
2008-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
37-55
ISSN
  • 1366-4530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-5120
OpenAlex
W1995835123
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Teacher Development (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Programs
Keywords
online learning, teacher professional development, distance education, coaching, teacher confidence, Qualified Teacher Status, mathematics teacher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using e‐learning to support primary trainee teachers’ development of mathematical subject knowledge: An analysis of learning and the impact on confidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13664530701827731
The paper
Burgess, H., & Mayes, A. S. (2008). Using e‐learning to support primary trainee teachers’ development of mathematical subject knowledge: An analysis of learning and the impact on confidence. Teacher Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530701827731