The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility
Abstract
We first compare and contrast current conceptualizations of workplace flexibility in order to arrive at a definition in harmony with its contemporary use: ‘the ability of workers to make choices influencing when, where, and for how long they engage in work-related tasks’. Next, we situate workplace flexibility in its theoretical contexts to provide researchers with a clearer understanding of what workplace flexibility is, what its mechanisms of operation are, and why it may be related to other concepts. Finally, we present a conceptual framework of antecedents and consequences of workplace flexibility, including illustrative examples of several basic associations from the peer-reviewed literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496 · Cited by 837 · cited 3×
“Usually this is done by working four 10-hour days, with Friday or Monday off, but three-day work weeks are becoming more frequently used (Baltes et al., 1999).”
Background
Cited by
Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions.
Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713495704 · Cited by 341
Richman, A. L., Civian, J. T., Shannon, L. L., Jeffrey Hill, E., & Brennan, R. T. (2008) · Community, Work & Family · doi:10.1080/13668800802050350 · Cited by 296
Self-citationBal, P. M., & De Lange, A. H. (2015) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12082 · Cited by 261
Harm of efficiency oriented HRM practices on stakeholders: an ethical issue for sustainability
Mariappanadar, S. (2012) · Society and Business Review · doi:10.1108/17465681211237628 · Cited by 97
Linking Work Engagement to Job Performance Through Flexible Human Resource Management
Sekhar, C., Patwardhan, M., & Vyas, V. (2018) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/1523422317743250 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeffrey Hill, E., Grzywacz, J. G., Allen, S., Blanchard, V. L., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M.
- Venue
- Community, Work & Family
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-163
- ISSN
- 1366-8803 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3615
- OpenAlex
- W1989020059
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13668800802024678
- The paper
- Jeffrey Hill, E., Grzywacz, J. G., Allen, S., Blanchard, V. L., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work & Family. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802024678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
