The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain
Abstract
In the social sciences, two prevailing definitions of risk are: (1) risk is a situation or event where something of human value (including humans themselves) is at stake and where the outcome is uncertain; (2) risk is an uncertain consequence of an event or an activity with respect to something that humans value. According to these definitions, risk expresses an ontology (a theory of being) independent of our knowledge and perceptions. In this paper, we look closer into these two types of definitions. We conclude that the definitions provide a sound foundation for risk research and risk management, but compared to common terminology, they lead to conceptual difficulties that are incompatible with the everyday use of risk in most applications. By considering risk as a state of the world, we cannot conclude, for example, about the risk being high or low, or compare different options with respect to risk. A rephrasing of the two definitions is suggested: Risk refers to uncertainty about and severity of the consequences (or outcomes) of an activity with respect to something that humans value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
“The uncertainty-founded risk perspectives (e.g. Aven et al., 2014; Aven & Renn, 2009; ISO, 2009a, 2009b; PSA-N, 2015 ) indicate that we should also include the pure probability-based perspectives, as the uncertainties are not sufficiently revealed for these perspectives; see also discussion in…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe risk concept—historical and recent development trends
Aven, T. (2012) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.006 · Cited by 596
Self-citationvan Asselt, M. B. A., & Renn, O. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.553730 · Cited by 420
Self-citationOn how to define, understand and describe risk
Aven, T. (2010) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011 · Cited by 360
Self-citationWangen, G., Hallstensen, C., & Snekkenes, E. (2018) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-017-0382-0 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Aven, T., & Renn, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Risk Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1366-9877 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4461
- OpenAlex
- W1969105374
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 104.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13669870802488883
- The paper
- Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802488883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.