Cited by 100Risk and Safety AnalysisRisk Perception and ManagementLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving risk matrices: the advantages of logarithmically scaled axes

Levine, E.S.·2012·Journal of Risk Research

Abstract

Risk matrices are a common tool used throughout the public and private sector to assess and manage risk qualitatively. However, these matrices have well-documented shortcomings when used for either assessment or management that can be shown by assuming a quantitative scale for the likelihood and consequence axes. This article describes the construction of a logarithmically scaled risk assessment matrix which alleviates some of the limitations inherent in using linearly structured risk matrices. In particular, logarithmic risk matrices can better differentiate between hazards with a large dynamic range in risks and, when used in combination with a new categorization scheme, the categorization of risks is more straightforward. These properties are demonstrated using a hypothetical example. Finally, the defensibility of logarithmic matrices is examined in the context of previously proposed rules for developing risk matrices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13669877.2011.634514

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • On the Theory of Scales of Measurement

    Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761 · cited 1×

    “In risk matrices, the likelihood and consequence bins that make up the axes are ordinal scales whose only permissible operations are relational, such as ‘high likelihood’> ‘low likelihood’, etc. (Stevens 1946, 1951).”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Altenbach, T.J. A comparison of risk assessment techniques from qualitative to quantitative. Proceedings of the joint ASME/JSME pressure vessels and piping conference. Honolulu, HI.
  2. Anderson K., 2006, Newsletter of the Australian Safety Critical Systems Association, 8
  3. 10.1080/13669870903564574 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00615.x · DOI
  6. Gabriel P., 2009, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 24, 5
  7. Hora S., 2007, Advances in decision analysis, 129, 10.1017/CBO9780511611308.009 · DOI
  8. Jarrett R., 2010, Dealing with uncertainties in policing serious crime, 67
  9. Johansen N., 2007, NOVATECH, 925
  10. Kent S., 1964, Studies in Intelligence, 8, 49
  11. 10.1080/13669871003703260 · DOI
  12. 2004, Risk management: AS/NZS 4360:2004
  13. Stevens S., 1951, Handbook of experimental psychology, 1
  14. Vose D., 2008, Risk analysis: A quantitative guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Levine, E. S.
Affiliations
United States Department of Homeland Security (US)
Corresponding author
Levine, E.S.
Venue
Journal of Risk Research
Published
2012-02
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
209-222
ISSN
  • 1366-9877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4461
OpenAlex
W1991258168
Cited by
100
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Risk Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
risk matrix, logarithmic scaling, qualitative risk assessment, risk classification, risk management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review