Cited by 123Multilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Grappling with translanguaging for teaching and assessment in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts: teacher perspectives from Oaxaca, Mexico

Open access
Schissel, Jamie L., De Korne, Haley, López-Gopar, Mario·2021·International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Abstract

Multilingual practices of translanguaging – fluid, complex, and dynamic processes of using one's complete linguistic repertoire – have been increasingly embraced by researchers and educators in bilingual education. Applying this perspective within the field of assessment has proven more challenging. In this project, we explore the role of multilingualism in teaching and classroom assessment design and practice, drawing upon the concept of translanguaging as a lens through which to explore the perceptions and practices of teachers. Working from assumptions that multilingualism in classrooms is an important tool to enhance the learning of linguistic minority students, we examined how teachers perceive and practice translanguaging in classroom language assessments through an action research case study with 40 language teachers in the linguistically and culturally diverse state of Oaxaca, Mexico. Their reflections ranged from the pressure to train students to produce monolingual-like language in order to pass international standardized tests to the potential to validate students’ linguistic repertoires and multicultural identities through increased use of translanguaging. Our analysis of this action research study and discussion of the potentials and limitations of translanguaging in teaching and assessments aims to contribute to the development of more equitable and effective multilingual education environments in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13670050.2018.1463965

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schissel, J. L., De Korne, H., & López-Gopar, M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Center for Multilingualism in Society across the Lifespan, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Facultad de Idiomas, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico
Corresponding author
Schissel, Jamie L.
Venue
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Published
2018-04-18
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
340-356
ISSN
  • 1367-0050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7522
OpenAlex
W2802703231
Cited by
123
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 6
FWCI
59.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
translanguaging, multilingualism, classroom assessment, teacher perceptions, language minority students, culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms, standardized testing, linguistic repertoire, multicultural identity, multilingual education, Oaxaca, Mexico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review