The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis
Open accessAbstract
The area of teachers' continuing professional development (CPD) is of growing interest internationally. However, while an increasing range of literature focuses on particular aspects of CPD, there is a paucity of literature addressing the spectrum of CPD models in a comparative manner. This article therefore considers a wide range of international literature, together with some specific examples from the Scottish context, in proposing a framework built around key characteristics of individual models of CPD. The framework identifies nine key models, which are then classified in relation to their capacity for supporting professional autonomy and transformative practice. The article considers the circumstances in which each of the nine models of CPD might be adopted, and explores the form(s) of knowledge that can be developed through any particular model. It also examines the power relationships inherent in the individual models and explores the extent to which CPD is perceived and promoted either as an individual endeavour related to accountability, or as a collaborative endeavour that supports transformative practice. Finally, it is argued that there is a need for greater interrogation of both the purpose and the potential outcomes of CPD structures - the framework outlined in this article is offered as one way of supporting such analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gore, J., Lloyd, A., Smith, M., Bowe, J., Ellis, H., & Lubans, D. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.007 · Cited by 342
Multicultural education professional development: A review of the literature
Parkhouse, H., Lu, C. Y., & Massaro, V. R. (2019) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654319840359 · Cited by 219
Beyond performativity: a pragmatic model of teacher professional learning
Lloyd, M., & Davis, J. P. (2018) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2017.1398181 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, A.
- Venue
- Journal of In-Service Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-250
- ISSN
- 1367-4587 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-5082
- OpenAlex
- W2076752573
- Cited by
- 796
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13674580500200277
- The paper
- Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580500200277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.