‘It's just drama’: teen perspectives on conflict and aggression in a networked era
Abstract
Contemporary youth conflict often plays out through social media like Facebook and Twitter. ‘Drama’ is an emergent concept describing performative, interpersonal conflict that takes place in front of an active, engaged audience, often on social media. Using ethnographic data, this paper examines how American teenagers conceptualize the term drama; the relationship between drama and social media; and the implications drama has for understanding contemporary teenage conflict. The emic use of drama distances teens from practices conceptualized by adults as bullying or relational aggression, while acknowledging the role of the audience in social media interactions. Drama also serves to reinforce the conventional gendered norms of high school, perpetrating the systemic undervaluing of feminine subjects and re-inscribing heteronormativity. Understanding how drama operates helps illuminate how widespread use of social media among teenagers has altered dynamics of aggression and conflict.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social media creates a new experience: public, quantifiable lists of top or best friends, which can foster jealousy and drama.
“One new experience created by social media is the quantifiable, public categorization of relationships into “top friends” or “best friends” lists, which may create the potential for jealousy and “drama” (Marwick and Boyd 2014).”
From Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 1—A Theoretical Framework and Application to Dyadic Peer Relationships (2018) · cites this paper as Marwick and Boyd 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Marwick, A., & boyd, D.
- Affiliations
- Fordham University (US)
- Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marwick, Alice
- Venue
- Journal of Youth Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-04-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1187-1204
- ISSN
- 1367-6261 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9680
- OpenAlex
- W2120785259
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 18.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Youth Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Microsoft Research
- Society for Research in Child Development
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Culture and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- drama, social media, relational aggression, bullying, audience effects, gender norms, heteronormativity, high school students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review