Cited by 21Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationSocial Media and Politics

Technologically situated: the tacit rules of platform participation

Open access
Pangrazio, Luci·2019·Journal of Youth Studies

Abstract

The ways in which young people use digital platforms develop with experience, and are guided by changing understandings of what they should – and should not – be doing online. As such, young people continually develop tacit rules and understandings that guide their platform participation. While based on social interactions with peers and other online contacts these rules are also technologically situated through the architecture of the platform. Based on research with Australian teenagers, this paper explores the ways in which Facebook shapes the communicative practices of young people, and how these were experienced and interpreted by them. Using the platform as a framework for the study demonstrates that some aspects of the Facebook architecture were particularly significant in structuring socialities, particularly: notifications and login for establishing habitual digital practices and norms; the prominence of images to (re)present identity; and the use of metrics (i.e. ‘likes’ and ‘friends’) to negotiate identities and relationships. Each of the participants initiated a range of strategies and rules to negotiate the ways in which the technological and the social were experienced through the platform. The paper concludes by considering the dominant values and social relations implicated through Facebook – and how they often reproduce dominant offline values and power relations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13676261.2019.1575345

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents who presented an idealized self that was inconsistent with their offline persona were less clear about how they felt about themselves.

    “In contrast, those who presented an idealized self that was inconsistent with their offline persona were less clear about how they felt about themselves (Davis, 2013; Fullwood et al., 2016; Pangrazio, 2019; Richardson, 2016; Yang et al., 2017).”

    From A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development (2025) · cites this paper as Pangrazio, 2019

  • Adolescents who present a fictitious version of themselves that differs from their authentic self tend to have lower self-concept clarity.

    “That is, adolescents who present a fictitious version of themselves that differs from their authentic self tend to have lower self-concept clarity (Davis, 2013; Fullwood et al., 2016; Pangrazio, 2019; Richardson, 2016; Yang et al., 2017).”

    From A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development (2025) · cites this paper as Pangrazio, 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pangrazio, L.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Pangrazio, Luci
Venue
Journal of Youth Studies
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1308-1326
ISSN
  • 1367-6261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9680
OpenAlex
W2891886496
Cited by
21
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Youth Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
youth, Facebook, digital platforms, platform architecture, social norms, online identity, notifications, social metrics, communicative practices, power relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review