The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a research agenda for post-disaster and post-crisis recovery strategies for tourist destinations: a narrative review
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a review of the literature concerning post-disaster and post-crisis recovery for tourist destinations. A total of 64 articles on this topic published in peer-reviewed tourism journals between January 2000 and June 2012 were included in the review. These articles were written on a number of different disaster contexts, including weather-related events (floods and hurricanes), natural disasters (earthquakes and tsunami) and other events (such as pandemics and terrorist attacks). The key themes that emerged included a lack of communication between stakeholders, media sensationalism, the importance of selecting the most effective marketing messages, lack of disaster-management plans, damage to destination image and reputation, and the changes in tourist behaviour following crises and disasters. The review identifies ways to improve the speed and effectiveness of response to disaster, the importance of relationship marketing with loyal customers and the need to quickly repair destination image. Suggestions for future research arising from this review include the urgent need to encourage tourism operators to engage with crisis preparedness and disaster-management strategies and the importance of gaining a better understanding of the consumer response to disastrous events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006) · Lancaster University · doi:10.13140/2.1.1018.4643 · Cited by 2,070 · cited 3×
“The usefulness of a synthesis will depend on both the quality and the quantity of the evidence base it is built on (Popay et al., 2006).”
Charmaz, K. (1995) · Rethinking Methods in Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446221792.n3 · Cited by 650
Cited by
Ritchie, B. W., & Jiang, Y. (2019) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2019.102812 · Cited by 820
Self-citation‘No Ebola…still doomed’ – The Ebola-induced tourism crisis
Novelli, M., Gussing Burgess, L., Jones, A., & Ritchie, B. W. (2018) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2018.03.006 · Cited by 641
Self-citationTourism in a world with pandemics: local-global responsibility and action
Jamal, T., & Budke, C. (2020) · Journal of Tourism Futures · doi:10.1108/jtf-02-2020-0014 · Cited by 452
Guo, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, C. (2018) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2018.1428335 · Cited by 127
Leading for Resilience: Fostering Employee and Organizational Resilience in Tourism Firms
Prayag, G., Muskat, B., & Dassanayake, C. (2024) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875231164984 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Mair, J., Ritchie, B. W., & Walters, G.
- Venue
- Current Issues in Tourism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 1368-3500 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7603
- OpenAlex
- W2025905498
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a research agenda for post-disaster and post-crisis recovery strategies for tourist destinations: a narrative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13683500.2014.932758
- The paper
- Mair, J., Ritchie, B. W., & Walters, G. (2016). Towards a research agenda for post-disaster and post-crisis recovery strategies for tourist destinations: a narrative review. Current Issues in Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.932758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.