The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New realities: a systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research
Open accessAbstract
Despite the growing interest and discussions on Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) in tourism, we do not yet know systematically the knowledge that has been built from academic papers on VR and AR in tourism; if and how VR and AR research intersect, the methodologies used to research VR and AR in tourism, and the emerging contexts in which VR and AR have surfaced in tourism research. By conducting a systematic literature review on VR/AR research in tourism, this work seeks to answer five main research questions: (1) Which tourism sectors and contexts have VR and AR research emerged in?; (2) Which forms of VR and AR have garnered the most attention in tourism research?; (3 and 4) What methodologies/theories are being utilized to research VR and AR in tourism?; and (5) What are the research gaps in VR and AR tourism research? From a synthesis of 46 manuscripts, marketing and tourism education emerged as the most common contexts. However, issues with heterogeneity appeared in terminology usage alongside a lack of theory-based research in VR and AR. Also, gaps were identified where challenges identified revolved around awareness of the technology, usability, and time commitment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.8.819 · Cited by 3,272
Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923649709526970 · Cited by 2,005
Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013 · Cited by 992 · cited 1×
“In a nascent fi eld such as this, an investigation of prior research is important to reveal the current state of research and offer guidance to researchers seeking to enter the discussion (Höf fl er & Leutner, 2007; Karatas, 2008).”
Dinh, H. Q., Walker, N., Hodges, L. F., Song, C., & Kobayashi, A. (2003) · Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316) · doi:10.1109/vr.1999.756955 · Cited by 566
Cited by
Loureiro, S. M. C., Guerreiro, J., & Ali, F. (2020) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104028 · Cited by 659
Fan, X., Jiang, X., & Deng, N. (2022) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104534 · Cited by 586
Dincelli, E., & Yayla, A. (2022) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101717 · Cited by 490
A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction
Davila Delgado, J. M., Oyedele, L., Demian, P., & Beach, T. (2020) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101122 · Cited by 486
Predicting the intentions to use chatbots for travel and tourism
Melián-González, S., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., & Bulchand-Gidumal, J. (2021) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2019.1706457 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Yung, R., & Khoo-Lattimore, C.
- Venue
- Current Issues in Tourism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-12-28
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2056-2081
- ISSN
- 1368-3500 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7603
- OpenAlex
- W2778498795
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New realities: a systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359
- The paper
- Yung, R., & Khoo-Lattimore, C. (2019). New realities: a systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.