CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 188HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ IssuesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘It's raining stones’: stigma, violence and HIV vulnerability among men who have sex with men in Dakar, Senegal

Niang, Cheikh Ibrahima, Tapsoba, Placide, Weiss, Ellen, Diagne, Moustapha, Niang, Youssoupha, Moreau, Amadou Mody, Gomis, Dominique, Wade, Abdoulaye SidbÉ, Seck, Karim, Castle, Chris·2003·Culture, Health & Sexuality
DOI 10.1080/1369105031000152715
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research in many countries has highlighted the vulnerability of men who have sex with men to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Yet in Africa, such men have received little attention in HIV/AIDS programming and service delivery because of the widespread denial and stigmatization of male homosexual behaviour. In Dakar, Senegal, a study conducted by researchers from Cheikh Anta Diop University, the Senegal National Council Against AIDS, and the Horizons Program elicited quantitative and qualitative data about the needs, behaviours, knowledge, and attitudes of men who have sex with men. Findings reveal that respondents have distinct identities and social roles that go beyond sexual practices, that sex with men is driven by many reasons, including love, pleasure, and economic exchange, and that respondents' lives are often characterized by stigma, violence and rejection. The data also highlight that many men are at risk of HIV because of unprotected sex with other men, a history of STI symptoms, and poor knowledge of STIs. The study underscores the need for non‐stigmatizing, sexual health information and services.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369105031000152715

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Herdt G 1997Same Sex, Different Cultures(Boulder, CO: Westview Press)
  2. Murray S. O Roscoe W (eds) 1998Boy‐Wives and Female Husbands: Studies of AfricanHomosexualities(New York: St. Martins Press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Niang, C. I., Tapsoba, P., Weiss, E., Diagne, M., Niang, Y., Moreau, A. M., Gomis, D., Wade, A. S., Seck, K., & Castle, C.
Venue
Culture, Health & Sexuality
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-01
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
499-512
ISSN
  • 1369-1058 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5351
DOI
10.1080/1369105031000152715
OpenAlex
W2083738033
Cited by
188
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Culture Health & Sexuality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
men who have sex with men, HIV vulnerability, HIV stigma, violence against men, sexual health services, sexually transmitted infections, unprotected sex, sexual identity, social rejection, HIV prevention, Dakar, Senegal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review