Cited by 249HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesCultural Competency in Health Care

Culture and African contexts of HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support

Open access
Airhihenbuwa, Collins O., Webster, J. DeWitt·2004·SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS

Abstract

Culture plays a vital role in determining the level of health of the individual, the family and the community. This is particularly relevant in the context of Africa, where the values of extended family and community significantly influence the behaviour of the individual. The behaviour of the individual in relation to family and community is one major cultural factor that has implications for sexual behaviour and HIV/AIDS prevention and control efforts. As the impact of HIV/AIDS in Africa remains unabated, a culture-centered approach to prevention, care and support is increasingly recognised as a critical strategy. In this article PEN-3, a model developed to centralise culture in health promotion interventions, is presented as a framework to be used in HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support in Africa. The three domains of the PEN-3 model incorporate specific constructs: relationships and expectations, cultural empowerment, and cultural identity. The cultural empowerment and relationships and expectations domains are 'assessment/appraisal' domains used for cultural assessment. Community identity is the 'application/transformation' domain that helps the public health practitioner assist the community to identify the point of entry of the intervention. In this paper the authors describe PEN-3 and then present examples of how the assessment/appraisal domains can be utilised to frame HIV/AIDS-related concerns in the context of Africa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17290376.2004.9724822

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Airhihenbuwa, C. O., & Webster, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
4-13
ISSN
  • 1729-0376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1813-4424
OpenAlex
W2120305833
Cited by
246
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAHARA-J Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
HIV prevention, HIV/AIDS care and support, PEN-3 model, cultural empowerment, cultural identity, sexual behavior, cultural assessment, community identity, Africa
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Attitude to Health, Culture, Humans, Perception, Social Identification, Social Support, HIV Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review