The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps
Abstract
Digital health technologies are playing an increasingly important role in healthcare, health education and voluntary self-surveillance, self-quantification and self-care practices. This paper presents a critical analysis of one digital health device: computer apps used to self-track features of users' sexual and reproductive activities and functions. After a review of the content of such apps available in the Apple App Store and Google Play™ store, some of their sociocultural, ethical and political implications are discussed. These include the role played by these apps in participatory surveillance, their configuration of sexuality and reproduction, the valorising of the quantification of the body in the context of neoliberalism and self-responsibility, and issues concerning privacy, data security and the use of the data collected by these apps. It is suggested that such apps represent sexuality and reproduction in certain defined and limited ways that work to perpetuate normative stereotypes and assumptions about women and men as sexual and reproductive subjects. Furthermore there are significant ethical and privacy implications emerging from the use of these apps and the data they produce. The paper ends with suggestions concerning the 'queering' of such technologies in response to these issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1976) · Cited by 10,813
Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault.
Porter, J. N., Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072021 · Cited by 2,145
The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body
Lupton, D. (1995) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221976 · Cited by 1,268
Self-citationThe New Public Health: Health and Self in the Age of Risk
Petersen, A., & Lupton, D. (2000) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446217429 · Cited by 1,264
Self-citationThe imperative of health: public health and the regulated body
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3358 · Cited by 1,067
Swan, M. (2012) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan1030217 · Cited by 934 · cited 1×
“…technologies and wearable computing with the potential of both ‘small data’ (detailed data one collects about oneself) and ‘big data’ (large masses of aggregated data) will inform lay people and healthcare and public health professionals alike (Smarr 2012; Swan 2012a, 2012b; Topol 2012).”
The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era
Lupton, D. (2013) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/sth.2013.10 · Cited by 728
Self-citationQuantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies
Lupton, D. (2013) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2013.794931 · Cited by 646
Self-citationIMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics
Evans, R. (2014) · Nursing Standard · doi:10.7748/ns2014.04.28.32.30.s36 · Cited by 594
Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know
Andrejevic, M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203075319 · Cited by 499
Cited by
Sharon, T. (2017) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5 · Cited by 428
Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools
Epstein, D. A., Lee, N. B., Kang, J. H., Agapie, E., Schroeder, J., Pina, L. R., Fogarty, J., Kientz, J. A., & Munson, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025635 · Cited by 346
Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary
Lupton, D. (2015) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dau091 · Cited by 346
Self-citationCritical Perspectives on Digital Health Technologies
Lupton, D. (2014) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12226 · Cited by 330
Self-citationSelf-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics
Lupton, D. (2014) · Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design · doi:10.1145/2686612.2686623 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lupton, D.
- Venue
- Culture, Health & Sexuality
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-06-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 440-453
- ISSN
- 1369-1058 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5351
- OpenAlex
- W2128608692
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 36.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
- The paper
- Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.