Cited by 346Public Health Policies and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Media in Health Education

Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary

Open access
Lupton, D.·2015·Health Promotion International

Abstract

A range of digitized health promotion practices have emerged in the digital era. Some of these practices are voluntarily undertaken by people who are interested in improving their health and fitness, but many others are employed in the interests of organizations and agencies. This article provides a critical commentary on digitized health promotion. I begin with an overview of the types of digital technologies that are used for health promotion, and follow this with a discussion of the socio-political implications of such use. It is contended that many digitized health promotion strategies focus on individual responsibility for health and fail to recognize the social, cultural and political dimensions of digital technology use. The increasing blurring between voluntary health promotion practices, professional health promotion, government and corporate strategies requires acknowledgement, as does the increasing power wielded by digital media corporations over digital technologies and the data they generate. These issues provoke questions for health promotion as a practice and field of research that hitherto have been little addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapro/dau091

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gehl, R. (2014) Reverse Engineering Social Media: Revealing the Underside of Our Technology-Laden World. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
  2. Lupton, D. (in press[b]) Digitized health promotion: risk and personal responsibility for health and illness in the Web 2.0 era. In Davis, J. and A.M Gonzalez (eds), To Fix or to Heal: Reductionism and Individualism in Contemporary Medicine, Public Health, and Bioethics. New York University Press, New York.
  3. Lupton, D. (2015) Digital Sociology. Routledge, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lupton, D.
Affiliations
University of Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
Lupton, D.
Venue
Health Promotion International
Published
2014-10-15
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
174-183
ISSN
  • 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2245
OpenAlex
W1978386788
Cited by
346
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Promotion International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
health promotion, digital technologies, digital health promotion, personal responsibility for health, socio-political implications, health data
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Obesity, Health Behavior, Public Health Practice, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Internet, Biomedical Technology, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review