The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1
Abstract
This paper looks at the prevalence of creative activity and sharing in an age when the barriers to disseminating material have been considerably lowered compared with earlier times. The authors use unique data to explore the extent to which young adults create video, music, writing and artistic photography, as well as the prevalence of sharing such material online. Findings suggest that despite new opportunities to engage in such distribution of content, relatively few people are taking advantage of these recent developments. Moreover, neither creation nor sharing is randomly distributed among a diverse group of young adults. Consistent with existing literature, creative activity is related to a person's socioeconomic status as measured by parental schooling. The novel act of sharing online, however, is considerably different by gender with men much more likely to engage in it. However, once internet user skill is controlled for, men and women are equally likely to post their materials on the Web.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills
Hargittai, E. (2002) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 · Cited by 1,951 · cited 1×
“Some of the work exploring details of differentiated internet use has started looking at people’s digital literacy to distinguish among users’ abilities in navigating digital media (Hargittai 2002, 2008; Mossberger et al. 2003; Bunz 2004).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”
Hargittai, E. (2010) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.2009.00317.x · Cited by 1,564
Self-citationMotivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media
Munar, A. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2014) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.012 · Cited by 1,259
(2010) · Issue Lab (Candid) · Cited by 701
Digital inequalities in the age of artificial intelligence and big data
Lutz, C. (2019) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.140 · Cited by 411
Digital entrepreneurship: Innovative business models for the sharing economy
Richter, C., Kraus, S., Brem, A., Durst, S., & Giselbrecht, C. (2017) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12227 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-256
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2128724692
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13691180801946150
- The paper
- Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.