Digital entrepreneurship: Innovative business models for the sharing economy
Abstract
What's mine is yours . An increasing number of people are participating in sharing and exchanging information, knowledge, data and goods. As research addressing the so‐called ‘sharing economy’ is still in its infancy, this article aims to shed light on it. To do this, a qualitative research approach comprising guided interviews with 14 companies from Germany, Austria and Switzerland provides detailed insights into different aspects of the sharing economy phenomenon. Our results make a direct contribution to sharing economy research, especially regarding the new business models of start‐ups. Here, we find a clear difference between the relevance of economic and social orientation. The latter appears to be in higher demand among customers than entrepreneurs. The increasingly digitalized environment has led to a changed living situation characterized by urbanity, openness to new solutions, changed working situations and new mindsets. All of these aspects drive the sharing economy. The results of this paper are summarized in a framework highlighting the requirements, drivers and goals of the sharing economy. Considering the limited research in this field, the developed framework is a strong basis for discussion, critique and/or support of future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455 · see citing works
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690600500107 · Cited by 11,829 · see citing works
Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2010) · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91538-8 · Cited by 1,586 · see citing works
Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb
Ert, E., Fleischer, A., & Magen, N. (2016) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013 · Cited by 1,295 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
- Authors
- Richter, C., Kraus, S., Brem, A., Durst, S., & Giselbrecht, C.
- Affiliations
- Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
- University of Liechtenstein (LI)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- University of Skövde (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Richter, Chris
- Venue
- Creativity and Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-16
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 300-310
- ISSN
- 0963-1690 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8691
- OpenAlex
- W2623380270
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 39.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Creativity and Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- sharing economy, digital entrepreneurship, business models, startups, social orientation, economic orientation, consumer preferences, urbanization, digitalization, framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review