The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application
Abstract
Crowdsourcing is an online, distributed problem-solving and production model already in use by businesses such as Threadless.com, iStockphoto.com, and InnoCentive.com. This model, which harnesses the collective intelligence of a crowd of Web users through an open-call format, has the potential for government and non-profit applications. Yet, in order to explore new applications for the crowdsourcing model, there must be a better understanding of why crowds participate in crowdsourcing processes. Based on 17 interviews conducted via instant messenger with members of the crowd at Threadless, the present study adds qualitatively rich data on a new crowdsourcing case to an existing body of quantitative data on motivations for participation in crowdsourcing. Four primary motivators for participation at Threadless emerge from these interview data: the opportunity to make money, the opportunity to develop one's creative skills, the potential to take up freelance work, and the love of community at Threadless. A fifth theme is also discussed that addresses the language of ‘addiction’ used by the interviewees to describe their activity on the site. Understanding this kind of ‘addiction’ in an online community is perhaps the most important finding for future public crowdsourcing ventures. This study develops a more complete – though ongoing – composite of what motivates the crowd to participate in crowdsourcing applications generally, information crucial to adapt the crowdsourcing model to new forms of problem-solving.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 · Cited by 20,808
Qualitative Communication Research Methods
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (1994) · Cited by 5,362
The online disinhibition effect
Suler, J. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/1094931041291295 · Cited by 4,375
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps
Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2008.80 · Cited by 3,194
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1645 · Cited by 2,925
Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0301_02 · Cited by 2,810 · cited 1×
“This is not to say the behaviourist researchers of the ‘old’ media era do not still have some relevance (Ruggiero 2000).”
BackgroundWright, K. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x · Cited by 2,550
The difference: how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1534 · Cited by 2,280
Cited by
Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests
Zheng, H., Li, D., & Hou, W. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415150402 · Cited by 538
Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice.
McFarland, L. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0039244 · Cited by 414
Crowdsourcing research: Data collection with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Sheehan, K. B. (2018) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1342043 · Cited by 408
Community‐Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation
Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00565.x · Cited by 336
Translating Commons-Based Peer Production Values into Metrics
De Filippi, P. (2015) · Handbook of Digital Currency · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802117-0.00023-0 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Brabham, D. C.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08-17
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1122-1145
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W1907282519
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 61.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13691181003624090
- The paper
- Brabham, D. C. (2010). MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003624090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.