The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of social media using digital methods is a flourishing approach. However, the relatively easy availability of data collected via platform application programming interfaces has arguably led to the predominance of single-platform research of social media. Such research has also privileged the role of text in social media analysis, as a form of data that is more readily gathered and searchable than images. In this paper, we challenge both of these prevailing forms of social media research by outlining a methodology for visual cross-platform analysis (VCPA), defined as the study of still and moving images across two or more social media platforms. Our argument contains three steps. First, we argue that cross-platform analysis addresses a gap in research methods in that it acknowledges the interplay between a social phenomenon under investigation and the medium within which it is being researched, thus illuminating the different affordances and cultures of web platforms. Second, we build on the literature on multimodal communication and platform vernacular to provide a rationale for incorporating the visual into cross-platform analysis. Third, we reflect on an experimental cross-platform analysis of images within social media posts (n = 471,033) used to communicate climate change to advance different modes of macro- and meso-levels of analysis that are natively visual: image-text networks, image plots and composite images. We conclude by assessing the research pathways opened up by VCPA, delineating potential contributions to empirical research and theory and the potential impact on practitioners of social media communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 1×
“Individual platforms do not just have their own politics (Gillespie, 2010), but also particular ways of shaping the creative possibilities of user expression within platform vernaculars (Burgess, 2006).”
BackgroundHighfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332 · Cited by 542
Digital photography: communication, identity, memory
van Dijck, J. (2008) · Visual Communication · doi:10.1177/1470357207084865 · Cited by 508
A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics
Zimmer, M., & Proferes, N. J. (2014) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-09-2013-0083 · Cited by 257
Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide
Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008 · Cited by 254
Data not seen: The uses and shortcomings of social media metrics
Baym, N. K. (2013) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4873 · Cited by 199
Cited by
The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.569 · Cited by 334
Self-citationKresin, S., Kremer, K., & Büssing, A. G. (2024) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21855 · Cited by 32
The selfie production model: Rethinking selfie taking, editing, and posting practices
Qutub, A. (2021) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2021-4-4 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-06-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-180
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2809526515
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 53.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1486871
- The paper
- Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T. (2020). Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1486871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.