The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalization of politics on Facebook: examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization
Open accessAbstract
With the integration of social media in political communication repertoires, politicians now permanently campaign for support online. By promoting their personal agenda, politicians increasingly profile themselves independent from their associated parties on the web (i.e., self-personalization). By focusing on self-personalization as a multi-layered concept (i.e., professional, emotional, private self-personalization), this study investigates both the use and consequences of self-personalization on Facebook. A manual content analysis of politicians’ Facebook posts (N = 435) reveals that self-personalization is indeed often used as a communication style on Facebook and is most often present in visual communication. Moreover, the study shows that the use of a more emotional and private style provides a beneficial tool for politicians’ impression management. Publishing emotional and private content yields positive effects on audience engagement, suggesting audiences’ demand for more intimate and emotional impressions of public figures on the web.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics
Strömbäck, J. (2008) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161208319097 · Cited by 1,373
The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812472322 · Cited by 871
Cited by
Xie, C., Yu, J., Huang, S. (., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104513 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Metz, M., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-02-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1481-1498
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2917428757
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 53.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personalization of politics on Facebook: examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1581244
- The paper
- Metz, M., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2020). Personalization of politics on Facebook: examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1581244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.