Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics
Abstract
Two concepts that have been used to describe the changes with regards to media and politics during the last fifty years are the concepts of mediation and mediatization . However, both these concepts are used more often than they are properly defined. Moreover, there is a lack of analysis of the process of mediatization, although the concept as such denotes a process.Thus the purpose of this article is to analyze the concepts of mediated and mediatized politics from a process-oriented perspective. The article argues that mediatization is a multidimensional and inherently process-oriented concept and that it is possible to make a distinction between four phases of mediatization. Each of these phases is analyzed.The conclusion is that as politics becomes increasingly mediatized, the important question no longer is related to the independence of the media from politics and society. The important question becomes the independence of politics and society from the media.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Politics has adapted to the power and intricate rules of the media.
“As an institutional logic and force, mediatization has demonstrated its relevance, for example, in politics, which has adapted to the power and intricate rules of the media (Asp, 1986;Strömbäck, 2008).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age (2024) · cites this paper as Strömbäck, 2008
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Driessens, O. (2013) · International Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367877912459140 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change
Hjarvard, S. (2011) · Culture and Religion · doi:10.1080/14755610.2011.579719 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Darius, P. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age
Räisä, T., & Stocchetti, M. (2024) · Journal of Digital Social Research · doi:10.33621/jdsr.v6i3.33235 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“As an institutional logic and force, mediatization has demonstrated its relevance, for example, in politics, which has adapted to the power and intricate rules of the media (Asp, 1986; Strömbäck, 2008).”
Background
- Authors
- Strömbäck, J.
- Affiliations
- Mid Sweden University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Strömbäck, Jesper
- ORCID
- Strömbäck, Jesper
- Venue
- The International Journal of Press/Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 228-246
- ISSN
- 1040-1620 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1612
- 1940-1620
- OpenAlex
- W2147160422
- Cited by
- 1,373
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 99.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Press/Politics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mittuniversitetet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- mediatization, mediatization of politics, mediation (cultural/media theory), media and politics, media independence, political communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review