Cited by 24Populism, Right-Wing MovementsMisinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and Politics

Maintenance or change? Examining the reinforcing spiral between social media news use and populist attitudes

Open access
Schumann, Sandy, Thomas, Fabian, Ehrke, Franziska, Bertlich, Tisa, Dupont, Julia C.·2022·Information, Communication & Society

Abstract

Citizens around the world increasingly express support for populism. Here, we apply the reinforcing spirals model to examine whether, and how, social media news use shapes populist attitudes over time. Specifically, we assess if using social media as a news source serves to maintain existing populist attitudes or facilitates a shift in attitudes to a more extreme position. A cross-sectional survey (N1 = 195) highlighted a positive correlation between social media news use and populist attitudes. A four-wave longitudinal survey (N2 = 386) further showed that this relationship reflects media and selection effects. Over a period of three months, more frequent social media news use predicted stronger populist attitudes at subsequent measuring points. In addition, higher levels of populist attitudes were related to more frequent social media news consumption in the following waves. However, the frequency of social media news use did not change over time and populist attitudes did not become stronger during the study period. Taken together, the findings indicate that social media news use contributed to the maintenance of populist attitudes at a stable level. There is no evidence to suggest social media news use predicted more extreme populist attitudes. We discuss these results with respect to the (potentially continued) rise of populism; we also critically reflect on the phenomenon of attitude polarization online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369118x.2021.1907435

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Schumann, S., Thomas, F., Ehrke, F., Bertlich, T., & Dupont, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Corresponding author
Schumann, Sandy
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Published
2021-04-08
Volume
25
Issue
13
Pages
1934-1951
ISSN
  • 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4462
OpenAlex
W3154265340
Cited by
24
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Communication & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Association for Social Psychology
  • Forschungsinitiative Rheinland-Pfalz, Research focus Communication, Media and Politics
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
social media news use, populist attitudes, attitude change, media influence, selection effects, news consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review