Cited by 1,044Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Isenberg, Daniel J.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This article critically reviews recent (1974–1982) group polarization studies that address themselves to either one of the two primary explanatory mechanisms thought to underly group polarization, namely social comparison and persuasive argumentation processes. A summary of the effect sizes of 21 pu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repulsive interactions combined with homophily lead to a decrease of polarization.

    “Another class of models describe polarization by introducing repulsive interactions, in which users reject opinions that differ from their own [24-26], but this mechanism combined with homophily leads to a decrease of polarization [27, 28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isenberg, D. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Isenberg, Daniel J.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1986-06
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
1141-1151
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2042714524
Cited by
1,044
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 66
FWCI
23.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
group polarization, social comparison, persuasive argumentation, group decision making, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review