Cited by 168Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration, Racism, and Human RightsDiaspora, migration, transnational identity

Discrimination in migration and citizenship

Open access
Ellermann, Antje·2020·Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

Abstract

After decades of scholarly optimism that the immigration reforms that swept across the Global North in the postwar era had ushered in a new age of non-discriminatory migration policy, recent scholarship has challenged this narrative. This Special Issue offers an empirical and normative contribution to this critical turn in migration studies by examining the multiple ways in which immigration and citizenship policy continues to create hierarchies among migrants that mirror the intersection of non-meritocratic attributes of social group membership. We show that access to territory and citizenship is governed by highly differentiated legal distinctions that closely map onto social identities such as gender, race/ethnicity, nationality, religion, and class. This introduction maps two important and interrelated developments in the literature which this issue engages. First, the ‘politics of belonging’ remains shaped by the intersection of multiple axes of inclusion and exclusion that are (re)produced by immigration and citizenship policy. Second, whereas legal precarity has long been associated with undocumented and temporary immigration status, over the past two decades precarity has penetrated all immigration status, including those that have long been understood as secure. The article concludes with an overview of the Special Issue’s individual contributions and identifies some remaining research needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369183x.2018.1561053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ellermann (2020) asserts that pre-entry language tests for spouses who wish to immigrate to Germany and the Netherlands disproportionately target Muslim women from Turkey and Morocco.

    “For example, Ellermann (2020) asserts that pre-entry language tests for spouses who wish to immigrate to Germany and the Netherlands disproportionately target Muslim women from Turkey and Morocco.”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Ellermann 2020

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 168

Authors
Ellermann, A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Ellermann, Antje
Venue
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Published
2019-02-13
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
2463-2479
ISSN
  • 1369-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9451
OpenAlex
W2912675365
Cited by
168
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
FWCI
31.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2013-1065)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
Keywords
immigration policy, citizenship policy, discrimination, intersectionality, politics of belonging, legal precarity, social identity, gender, race and ethnicity, nationality, class, immigration status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review