Discrimination in migration and citizenship
Open accessAbstract
After decades of scholarly optimism that the immigration reforms that swept across the Global North in the postwar era had ushered in a new age of non-discriminatory migration policy, recent scholarship has challenged this narrative. This Special Issue offers an empirical and normative contribution to this critical turn in migration studies by examining the multiple ways in which immigration and citizenship policy continues to create hierarchies among migrants that mirror the intersection of non-meritocratic attributes of social group membership. We show that access to territory and citizenship is governed by highly differentiated legal distinctions that closely map onto social identities such as gender, race/ethnicity, nationality, religion, and class. This introduction maps two important and interrelated developments in the literature which this issue engages. First, the ‘politics of belonging’ remains shaped by the intersection of multiple axes of inclusion and exclusion that are (re)produced by immigration and citizenship policy. Second, whereas legal precarity has long been associated with undocumented and temporary immigration status, over the past two decades precarity has penetrated all immigration status, including those that have long been understood as secure. The article concludes with an overview of the Special Issue’s individual contributions and identifies some remaining research needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ellermann (2020) asserts that pre-entry language tests for spouses who wish to immigrate to Germany and the Netherlands disproportionately target Muslim women from Turkey and Morocco.
“For example, Ellermann (2020) asserts that pre-entry language tests for spouses who wish to immigrate to Germany and the Netherlands disproportionately target Muslim women from Turkey and Morocco.”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Ellermann 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Ellermann, A.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ellermann, Antje
- ORCID
- Ellermann, Antje
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-02-13
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2463-2479
- ISSN
- 1369-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9451
- OpenAlex
- W2912675365
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 31.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2013-1065)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Keywords
- immigration policy, citizenship policy, discrimination, intersectionality, politics of belonging, legal precarity, social identity, gender, race and ethnicity, nationality, class, immigration status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review