Cited by 37Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin treatment versus metformin treatment in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Cai, Xiaoling, Shi, Lizheng, Yang, Wenjia, Gu, Shuyan, Chen, Yingyao, Nie, Lin, Ji, Linong·2019·Journal of Medical Economics

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dapagliflozin is the first SGLT2 inhibitor available in China, where the disease burden of diabetes and its complications is very heavy. Because a new diabetes treatment strategy for diabetes should consider its cost-effectiveness, compared with an existing treatment, this study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness between dapagliflozin and metformin treatment in China. METHODS: The Cardiff Diabetes Model (CDM) was used to estimate cost effectiveness and macro- and micro-vascular outcomes of dapagliflozin vs metformin. The CDM effectiveness inputs were derived from indirect comparative efficacy data from meta-analysis of 71 studies comparing monotherapy and add-on therapy of dapagliflozin vs metformin: dapagliflozin or metformin monotherapy, add-on therapy with other oral hypoglycemic agents, and add-on therapy with insulin. Direct medication costs and medical costs on treating diabetes were calculated based on published and local sources. A discount rate of 3% was applied to both costs and health effects. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to assess uncertainties. RESULTS: The total healthcare costs accumulated over the lifetime on dapagliflozin treatment arm was 8,626 Chinese yuan higher than the metformin treatment arm for an individual patient, and the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained with dapagliflozin treatment was 0.8 more than metformin treatment. Therefore, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 10,729 yuan per QALY gained for dapagliflozin treatment arm vs metformin treatment arm. The cost-effectiveness results were robust to various sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin treatment was more cost-effective compared with metformin treatment for Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. However, the findings of favorable cost-effectiveness results for dapagliflozin are largely driven by the effects of favorable weight profile on clinical, utility, and costs in the Cardiff model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13696998.2019.1570220

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Economic models have found use of SGLT2i to be a cost-effective strategy among patients with T2D based on its cardiovascular benefits.

    “Economic models have found use of SGLT2i to be a cost-effective strategy among patients with T2D based on its cardiovascular bene fi ts.”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [136]

    The Discussion reports that the Cardiff model found dapagliflozin cost-effective versus metformin for Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. But the Abstract says the favorable cost-effectiveness result was largely driven by dapagliflozin’s weight profile, not cardiovascular benefits. The model also predicted more nonfatal ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarctions in the dapagliflozin arm (Cardiff Diabetes Model analysis for the complications of type 2 diabetes; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th edition. [cited 2018 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.idf.org/e-library/ epidemiology-research/diabetes-atlas.html2017
  2. van Haalen HG, Pompen M, Bergenheim K, et al. Cost effective- ness of adding dapagliflozin to insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands. Clin Drug Investig. 2014; 34(2):135-146.
  3. Zheng Y, Wu J, Xie K. Incidence and cost of hypoglycemia epi- sode in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Chin Rural Health Serv Admin. 2012;32:1195-1198. Chinese.
  4. Meng H. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of type 2 diabetes complicated with urinary infections with two different antibiotics. J Shandong Med Coll. 2009;31:91-93. Chinese.
  5. Matza LS, Boye KS, Yurgin N, et al. Modelling EuroQol health- related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(7):1251-1265.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, X., Shi, L., Yang, W., Gu, S., Chen, Y., Nie, L., & Ji, L.
Affiliations
  • Peking University People's Hospital (CN)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Beijing Airport Hospital, Beijing, PR China
Corresponding author
  • Shi, Lizheng
  • Ji, Linong
Venue
Journal of Medical Economics
Published
2019-02-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
336-343
ISSN
  • 1369-6998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-837X
OpenAlex
W2912910847
Cited by
37
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca Ltd
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC1304901)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
dapagliflozin, metformin, type 2 diabetes, cost-effectiveness, SGLT2 inhibitors, quality-adjusted life years, health care costs, weight loss, Chinese patients
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Administration, Oral, Age Factors, Benzhydryl Compounds, Body Weight, China, Cholesterol, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Health Expenditures, Female, Glucosides, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Age of Onset, Models, Economic, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review