Cited by 411Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesPhytoestrogen effects and research

Prevalence of hot flushes and night sweats around the world: a systematic review

Freeman, E. W., Sherif, K.·2007·Climacteric

Abstract

Objective Many studies have evaluated the relationships between ethnicity and culture, prevalence of menopausal symptoms, and attitudes toward them, but few have assessed menopausal symptoms across cultures world-wide. This paper aims to systematically review the prevalence of hot flushes and night sweats, two prevalent symptoms of menopause, across the menopausal stages in different cultures and considers potential explanations for differences in prevalence rates. Design Sixty-six papers formed the basis for this review. Studies were organized by geographic region, and results are presented for North America, Europe, East Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia, Latin America, South Asia, Middle East, and Africa. Studies were included if they provided quantitative information on the occurrence of hot flushes. This report focuses on hot flushes and night sweats, the most common menopausal symptoms reported in epidemiologic studies. Results Studies reviewed indicate that vasomotor symptoms are highly prevalent in most societies. The prevalence of these symptoms varies widely and may be influenced by a range of factors, including climate, diet, lifestyle, women's roles, and attitudes regarding the end of reproductive life and aging. Patterns in hot flush prevalence were apparent for menopausal stages and, to a lesser degree, for regional variation. Conclusions Caregivers should recognize that variations exist and ask patients specific questions about symptoms and their impact on usual…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13697130601181486

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests ethnic and cultural differences may contribute to perceived interference and in reporting hot flash frequency and severity among post-menopausal women.

    “and there is evidence to suggest ethnic and cultural differences may contribute to perceived interference and in reporting hot flash of hot flash frequency and severity among post-menopausal women.55”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freeman, E. W., & Sherif, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
Venue
Climacteric
Published
2007-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
197-214
ISSN
  • 1369-7137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0804
OpenAlex
W2055622376
Cited by
411
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Climacteric (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cardinal Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
Keywords
hot flashes, night sweats, vasomotor symptoms, menopause, cross-cultural comparison, regional variation, climate and diet, women's roles, attitudes toward aging
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Menopause, Severity of Illness Index, Global Health, Prevalence, Women's Health, Hot Flashes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review