Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurocognitive Performance in Breast Cancer Survivors Exposed to Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Tamoxifen

Castellon, Steven A., Ganz, Patricia A., Bower, Julienne E., Petersen, Laura, Abraham, Laura, Greendale, Gail A.·2004·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

The primary aim of the current study was to examine whether neurocognitive functioning among breast cancer survivors (BCS) exposed to systemic adjuvant chemotherapy differs from that seen among BCS who did not receive chemotherapy. The performance of each of these BCS groups was compared to a demographically matched comparison group without history of breast cancer, a group not included in the majority of previous cognitive functioning studies. We also sought to explore whether usage of the anti-estrogen drug tamoxifen, a common component of breast cancer treatment, was related to neurocognitive functioning. Finally, we wished to examine the relationship between subjective report of cognitive functioning and objective performance on neurocognitive measures among BCS. Fifty-three survivors of breast cancer (all between 2-5 years after diagnosis and initial surgical removal of cancerous tissue) and 19 healthy non-BCS comparison subjects were administered a comprehensive neurocognitive battery, and measures of mood, energy level, and self-reported cognitive functioning. Those BCS who received adjuvant chemotherapy performed significantly worse in the domains of verbal learning, visuospatial functioning, and visual memory than BCS treated with surgery only. Those who received both chemotherapy and tamoxifen showed the greatest compromise. Although patients who received chemotherapy (with and without tamoxifen) performed worse than those treated with surgery only on several domains, neither group was significantly different from demographically matched comparison subjects without a history of breast cancer. Finally, we found no relationship between subjective cognitive complaints and objective performance, although cognitive complaints were associated with measures of psychological distress and fatigue. We highlight ways in which these data converge with other recent studies to suggest that systemic chemotherapy, especially in combination with tamoxifen, can have adverse yet subtle effects on cognitive functioning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13803390490510905

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Castellon, S. A., Ganz, P. A., Bower, J. E., Petersen, L., Abraham, L., & Greendale, G. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2004-10
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
955-969
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 1380-3395
  • 1744-411X
OpenAlex
W2049180305
Cited by
396
References
3
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurocognitive Performance in Breast Cancer Survivors Exposed to Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Tamoxifen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13803390490510905
The paper
Castellon, S. A., Ganz, P. A., Bower, J. E., Petersen, L., Abraham, L., & Greendale, G. A. (2004). Neurocognitive Performance in Breast Cancer Survivors Exposed to Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Tamoxifen. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490510905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.