Cited by 350Reading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyWriting and Handwriting Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia

Altemeier, Leah E., Abbott, Robert D., Berninger, Virginia W.·2008·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

Experiment 1: Hierarchical linear modeling of growth trajectories of three executive functions (inhibition; rapid automatic switching, RAS; and combined inhibition/switching) in typical readers and writers showed steady improvement of inhibition but leveling of RAS and inhibition/switching about fourth grade. In multiple regressions, RAS, entered after inhibition, contributed uniquely to literacy outcomes at every grade. Improvement of executive functions over the first four grades predicted literacy outcomes at fourth grade. Experiment 2: For children with dyslexia, executive functions explained less variance in literacy outcomes, and boys were worse in inhibition and inhibition/switching. Developmental, educational, and clinical significance of findings are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13803390701562818

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Delis , D. C. , Kaplan , E. and Kramer , J. H. 2001 . The Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System: Examiner's manual , San Antonio, TX : The Psychological Corporation .
  3. Denckla , M. B. 1996 . “ A theory and model of executive function ” . In Attention, memory, and executive function , Edited by: Lyon , G. R. and Krasnegor , N. A. 263 – 278 . Baltimore, MD : Brookes .
  4. Wiederholt , J. and Bryant , B. 1992 . Gray Oral Reading Test— , Third , Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources .
  5. Woodcock , R. and Johnson , B. 1990 . Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Revised Tests of Achievement. , Chicago : Riverside Publishing .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–348 of 348

Metadata

Authors
Altemeier, L. E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Altemeier, Leah E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2008-06-04
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
588-606
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 1380-3395
  • 1744-411X
OpenAlex
W2057217095
Cited by
350
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
executive function, dyslexia, literacy development, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, reading, writing, children, sex differences, developmental trajectories
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Attention, Child, Color Perception, Conflict, Psychological, Discrimination Learning, Dyslexia, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychometrics, Reading, Reference Values, Semantics, Sex Factors, Writing, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review