Methodological issues in investigations of the relative effects of schooling and age on school performance: the between-grade regression discontinuity design applied to Swedish TIMSS 1995 data
Abstract
The primary purpose of the study was to examine methodological issues in investigations of the relative effects of schooling and age on school performance. One means of separating these 2 effects involves the use of a between-grade regression discontinuity approach. However, amongst other things, this approach is based on assumptions concerning the mechanism for allocating students to grades. Using the Swedish sample of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 1995, which comprised 3 grades (Grades 6, 7, and 8), the study investigates the robustness of the regression discontinuity approach in terms of deviations from underlying assumptions. The main finding is that the technique is robust vis-à-vis deviations from a strictly age-based grade allocation present in the data. The pattern of substantive results also corresponds with those obtained in previous research, with the grade effect being about twice as strong as the age effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The strict assumptions of the school-age-cutoff method are sometimes not fully met.
“The strict assumptions of this method are sometimes not fully met (Cliffordson, 2010); methodological issues are discussed in more detail below.”
From How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Cliffordson, 2010
Cites
Does Staying in School Make You Smarter? The Effect of Education on IQ in The Bell Curve
Winship, C., & Korenman, S. (1997) · Intelligence, Genes, and Success · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0669-9_10 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis
Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618774253 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
“The strict assumptions of this method are sometimes not fully met (Cliffordson, 2010); methodological issues are discussed in more detail below.”
MethodThe contribution of schooling to learning gains of pupils in Years 1 to 6
Luyten, H., Merrell, C., & Tymms, P. (2017) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1297312 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cliffordson, C.
- Affiliations
- University West (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Cliffordson, Christina
- Venue
- Educational Research and Evaluation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-52
- ISSN
- 1380-3611 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-4187
- OpenAlex
- W2045700126
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Research and Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- regression discontinuity design, grade effects, age effects, academic performance, international student assessment, mathematics achievement, science achievement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review