Cited by 109Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGun Ownership and Violence ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Understanding and preventing military suicide.

Bryan, Craig J., Jennings, Keith W., Jobes, David A., Bradley, John C.·2012·Archives of Suicide Research

Abstract

The continual rise in the U.S. military's suicide rate since 2004 is one of the most vexing issues currently facing military leaders, mental health professionals, and suicide experts. Despite considerable efforts to address this problem, however, suicide rates have not decreased. The authors consider possible reasons for this frustrating reality, and question common assumptions and approaches to military suicide prevention. They further argue that suicide prevention efforts that more explicitly embrace the military culture and implement evidence-based strategies across the full spectrum of prevention and treatment could improve success. Several recommendations for augmenting current efforts to prevent military suicide are proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13811118.2012.667321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The weaker association in military samples supports prior hypotheses that military membership enhances social connections and diminishes thwarted belongingness.

    “This finding supports prior researchers’ hypotheses that membership in a military cohort, which emphasizes and facilitates the development of close interpersonal bonds, may enhance social connections and diminish thwarted belongingness”
  • Suicide prevention largely takes place within formal organizations, and several formal organizations are implicated in suicide risk.

    “This is a major limitation since suicide prevention largely takes place within formal organizations, and several formal organizations are implicated in suicide risk [e.g., occupations (Skipper and Williams, 2012), military (Bryan et al., 2012), and schools (Wyman et al., 2019)].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 109

Authors
Bryan, C. J., Jennings, K. W., Jobes, D. A., & Bradley, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2012-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
95-110
ISSN
  • 1381-1118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-6136
OpenAlex
W2168357029
Cited by
109
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Suicide Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
military suicide, suicide prevention, suicide rates, military culture, evidence-based prevention strategies, suicide treatment, military mental health, suicide prevention policy
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Culture, Humans, Military Personnel, Quality of Life, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review