Cited by 11Congenital limb and hand anomaliesGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic and rare skin diseases.

A novel variant in DOCK6 gene associated with Adams–Oliver syndrome type 2

Alzahem, Tariq, Alsalamah, Abrar K., Mura, Marco, Alsulaiman, Sulaiman M.·2020·Ophthalmic Genetics

Abstract

Background Adams-Oliver syndrome (AOS) is a rare, inherited multi-systemic malformation syndrome characterized by a combination of aplasia cutis congenita and transverse terminal limb defects along with variable involvement of the central nervous system, eyes, and cardiovascular system. AOS can be inherited as both autosomal-dominant and recessive traits. Pathogenic variants in the DOCK6, ARHGAP31, EOGT, RBPJ, DLL4 , and NOTCH1 genes have been associated with AOS. Purpose To report a novel homozygous variant in the DOCK6 gene associated with Adams-Oliver syndrome type 2. Materials and methods Case report. Results We report a case of a 4-month-old male who presented with microcephaly, global developmental delay, truncal hypotonia, and limb reduction defects. Ophthalmic examination revealed bilateral nystagmus and retinal detachment with mild cataractous changes in addition to retrolental plaque in the left eye. Next generation sequencing analysis identified a novel homozygous frameshift likely pathogenic variant (c.1269_1285dup (p.Arg429Glnfs*32)) in the DOCK6 gene. The constellation of the clinical findings and the genetic mutation were consistent with a diagnosis of AOS type 2. Conclusion The discovery of this new likely pathogenic variant enriches the genotypic spectrum of DOCK6 gene and contributes to genetic diagnosis and counseling of families with AOS. Neurologic and ocular findings appear to be consistent with AOS type 2 for which multidisciplinary clinical evaluation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13816810.2020.1776339

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alzahem, T., Alsalamah, A. K., Mura, M., & Alsulaiman, S. M.
Affiliations
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (SA)
Corresponding author
Alsulaiman, Sulaiman M.
Venue
Ophthalmic Genetics
Published
2020-06-05
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
377-380
ISSN
  • 1381-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5094
OpenAlex
W3033225494
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmic Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
Keywords
aplasia cutis congenita, limb reduction defects, microcephaly, global developmental delay, nystagmus, retinal detachment, cataract, Notch signaling, genetic counseling
MeSH terms
Ectodermal Dysplasia, Humans, Infant, Male, Mutation, Phenotype, Prognosis, Scalp Dermatoses, Limb Deformities, Congenital, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review