Cited by 256Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Memory Test Sensitivity for Diagnosing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Predicting Conversion to Alzheimer's Disease

Open access
Rabin, Laura A., Paré, Nadia, Saykin, Andrew J., Brown, Michael J., Wishart, Heather A., Flashman, Laura A., Santulli, Robert B.·2009·Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Abstract

Episodic memory is the first and most severely affected cognitive domain in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and it is also the key early marker in prodromal stages including amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The relative ability of memory tests to discriminate between MCI and normal aging has not been well characterized. We compared the classification value of widely used verbal memory tests in distinguishing healthy older adults (n = 51) from those with MCI (n = 38). Univariate logistic regression indicated that the total learning score from the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) ranked highest in terms of distinguishing MCI from normal aging (sensitivity = 90.2; specificity = 84.2). Inclusion of the delayed recall condition of a story memory task (i.e., WMS-III Logical Memory, Story A) enhanced the overall accuracy of classification (sensitivity = 92.2; specificity = 94.7). Combining Logical Memory recognition and CVLT-II long delay best predicted progression from MCI to AD over a 4-year period (accurate classification = 87.5%). Learning across multiple trials may provide the most sensitive index for initial diagnosis of MCI, but inclusion of additional variables may enhance overall accuracy and may represent the optimal strategy for identifying individuals most likely to progress to dementia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13825580902825220

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Chelune G. J., 2003, Prediction in forensic and neuropsychology: Sound statistical practices, 123
  2. Delis D. C., 2000, California Verbal Learning Test- Second Edition: Adult version manual
  3. Goodglass H., 2001, Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-Third Edition
  4. Jurica P., 2001, Dementia Rating Scale-2
  5. Lezak M. D., 2004, Neuropsychological assessment
  6. Morris J. C., 1989, Neurology, 44, 609
  7. Petersen R. C., 2007, CNS Spectrums, 45, 53
  8. Saykin A. J., 1992, Neurobehavioral function and activities of daily living rating sale (NBFADL- 63 item version)
  9. Schmidt M., 1996, Rey Auditory and Verbal Learning Test: A handbook
  10. Spitznagel M. B., 2006, Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 18, 186, 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18.2.186 · DOI
  11. Wechsler D., 1997, Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition, WMS-III administration and scoring manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–256 of 256

Metadata

Authors
Rabin, L. A., Paré, N., Saykin, A. J., Brown, M. J., Wishart, H. A., Flashman, L. A., & Santulli, R. B.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Rabin, Laura A.
Venue
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
Published
2009-05-05
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
357-376
ISSN
  • 0928-9917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1382-5585
  • 1744-4128
OpenAlex
W2150223607
Cited by
256
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG19771, R01AG019771)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
amnestic mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, conversion to Alzheimer's disease, episodic memory, California Verbal Learning Test-II, story recall, MCI diagnosis, normal aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Amnesia, Cognition Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Logistic Models, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review