Cited by 166Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsCritical Realism in Sociology

The ontology of artifacts

Baker, Lynne Rudder·2004·Philosophical Explorations

Abstract

Beginning with Aristotle, philosophers have taken artifacts to be ontologically deficient. This paper proposes a theory of artifacts, according to which artifacts are ontologically on a par with other material objects. I formulate a nonreductive theory that regards artifacts as constituted by—but not identical to—aggregates of particles. After setting out the theory, I rebut a number of arguments that disparage the ontological status of artifacts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13869790410001694462

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Design explanation is applicable to algorithms because algorithms are goal-directed, human artifacts produced in a specific sociotechnical context.

    “Design explanation is applicable to algorithms as the latter are goal-directed, human artifacts produced in a specific sociotechnical context (Baker 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, L. R.
Corresponding author
Baker, Lynne Rudder
Venue
Philosophical Explorations
Published
2004-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
99-111
ISSN
  • 1386-9795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-5918
OpenAlex
W2050589219
Cited by
166
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical Explorations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
Keywords
artifacts, material constitution, particles, Aristotle, material objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review