A Conceptual Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Policy Change: Measurement, Explanation and Strategies of Policy Dismantling
Abstract
The analysis of policy change has so far concentrated on the assessment and explanation of different degrees of change. The distinctions between radical versus incremental, path-breaking versus path-dependent or self-reinforcing versus reactive sequences have dominated the debate while the precise direction of policy change has rarely been taken into account. This article therefore concentrates on the extent to which policy change implies a “reduction”, “decrease” or “diminution” of existing policy arrangements. It conceives of this direction of policy change as “policy dismantling”. In developing analytical tools to identify and explain policy dismantling, the article aims to elucidate some of the causes, conditions and strategies of policy dismantling and to establish policy dismantling as a distinct category of policy change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Policy literature mainly operates on the assumption of institutional stability and incremental policy change, with far less extensive discussion of policy dismantling and reversals.
“Policy literature mainly operates on the assumption of institutional stability and incremental policy change, and there is far less extensive discussion on policy dismantling and reversals (Bauer, Green-Pedersen, Héritier, & Jordan, 2012;Bauer & Knill, 2014).”
From Towards a Conceptual Framework for Struggles over Democracy in Backsliding States: Gender Equality Policy in Central Eastern Europe (2018) · cites this paper as Bauer & Knill, 2014
Formal policy standards-in particular in area of environmental protection-remain often untouched, while de facto breaches take place but are unlikely to be persecuted.
“Formal policy standards -in particular in the area of environmental protection -remain thus often untouched, while de facto breaches take place but are unlikely to be persecuted (Bauer & Knill, 2014;Morais de Sá e Silva, 2022).”
From Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer & Knill, 2014
Analysts sometimes assume populist governments' intention to dismantle policy (especially environmental policy) without considering competing explanations, such as broader societal interests pushing for lower environmental policy standards.
“This is particularly the case when populist governments' intention to dismantle policy (especially environmental policy) is assumed without considering competing explanations, even if only to show that there are broader societal interests involved in pushing for lower environmental policy standards regardless of what quality the government of the day has (Bauer & Knill, 2014).”
From Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer & Knill, 2014
Cites
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · cited 3× · see citing works
“It was the work of Paul Pierson, in particular, that produced the term “dismantling”, which was coined in his famous book Dismantling the Welfare State (Pierson 1996, 2000, 2001, 2004; for reviews, see Starke 2006; Levy 2010; Green-Pedersen and Haverland 2002).”
BackgroundPolitics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
HACKER, J. S. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404001121 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Krizsan, A., & Roggeband, C. (2018) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v6i3.1414 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding
Bauer, M. W. (2024) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2023.2243400 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“Formal policy standards – in particular in the area of environmental protection – remain thus often untouched, while de facto breaches take place but are unlikely to be perse-cuted (Bauer & Knill, 2014; Morais de Sá e Silva, 2022).”
Self-citationUnderstanding mis-implementation in Public Health practice
Brownson, R. C., Allen, P., Jacob, R. R., Harris, J. K., Duggan, K., Hipp, P. R., & Erwin, P. C. (2015) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.11.015 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C.
- Affiliations
- German University of Administrative Sciences (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bauer, Michael W.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-44
- ISSN
- 1387-6988 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-5448
- OpenAlex
- W2035803413
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Keywords
- policy change, policy dismantling, reactive changes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review