Cited by 182Social Policy and Reform StudiesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPolicy Transfer and Learning

A Conceptual Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Policy Change: Measurement, Explanation and Strategies of Policy Dismantling

Bauer, Michael W., Knill, Christoph·2014·Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice

Abstract

The analysis of policy change has so far concentrated on the assessment and explanation of different degrees of change. The distinctions between radical versus incremental, path-breaking versus path-dependent or self-reinforcing versus reactive sequences have dominated the debate while the precise direction of policy change has rarely been taken into account. This article therefore concentrates on the extent to which policy change implies a “reduction”, “decrease” or “diminution” of existing policy arrangements. It conceives of this direction of policy change as “policy dismantling”. In developing analytical tools to identify and explain policy dismantling, the article aims to elucidate some of the causes, conditions and strategies of policy dismantling and to establish policy dismantling as a distinct category of policy change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13876988.2014.885186

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Policy literature mainly operates on the assumption of institutional stability and incremental policy change, with far less extensive discussion of policy dismantling and reversals.

    “Policy literature mainly operates on the assumption of institutional stability and incremental policy change, and there is far less extensive discussion on policy dismantling and reversals (Bauer, Green-Pedersen, Héritier, & Jordan, 2012;Bauer & Knill, 2014).”
  • Formal policy standards-in particular in area of environmental protection-remain often untouched, while de facto breaches take place but are unlikely to be persecuted.

    “Formal policy standards -in particular in the area of environmental protection -remain thus often untouched, while de facto breaches take place but are unlikely to be persecuted (Bauer & Knill, 2014;Morais de Sá e Silva, 2022).”
  • Analysts sometimes assume populist governments' intention to dismantle policy (especially environmental policy) without considering competing explanations, such as broader societal interests pushing for lower environmental policy standards.

    “This is particularly the case when populist governments' intention to dismantle policy (especially environmental policy) is assumed without considering competing explanations, even if only to show that there are broader societal interests involved in pushing for lower environmental policy standards regardless of what quality the government of the day has (Bauer & Knill, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C.
Affiliations
  • German University of Administrative Sciences (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Bauer, Michael W.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
Published
2014-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
28-44
ISSN
  • 1387-6988 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-5448
OpenAlex
W2035803413
Cited by
182
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
FWCI
32.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
Keywords
policy change, policy dismantling, reactive changes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review