Cited by 367Agricultural Innovations and PracticesInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingAgricultural Development and Management

Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: a tool for research, extension and policy

Open access
Kuehne, Geoff, Llewellyn, Rick, Pannell, David J., Wilkinson, Roger, Dolling, Perry, Ouzman, Jackie, Ewing, Mike·2017·Agricultural Systems

Abstract

There is much existing knowledge about the factors that influence adoption of new practices in agriculture but few attempts have been made to construct predictive quantitative models of adoption for use by those planning agricultural research, development, extension and policy. ADOPT (Adoption and Diffusion Outcome Prediction Tool) is the result of such an attempt, providing predictions of a practice's likely rate and peak level of adoption as well as estimating the importance of various factors influencing adoption. It employs a conceptual framework that incorporates a range of variables, including variables related to economics, risk, environmental outcomes, farmer networks, characteristics of the farm and the farmer, and the ease and convenience of the new practice. The ability to learn about the relative advantage of the practice, as influenced by characteristics of both the practice and the potential adopters, plays a central role. Users of ADOPT respond to 22 questions related to: a) characteristics of the practice that influence its relative advantage, b) characteristics of the population influencing their perceptions of the relative advantage of the practice, c) characteristics of the practice influencing the ease and speed of learning about it, and d) characteristics of the potential adopters that influence their ability to learn about the practice. ADOPT provides a prediction of the diffusion curve of the practice and sensitivity analyses of the factors influencing the speed and peak level of adoption. In this paper the model is described and its ability to predict the diffusion of agricultural practices is demonstrated using examples of new crop types, new cropping technology and grazing options. As well as providing predictions, ADOPT is designed to increase the conceptual understanding and consideration of the adoption process by those involved in agricultural research, development, extension and policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.007

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time delays in the effect of extension participation exist because the herd calving rate is determined by complex practices that do not give an immediate and observable return and require more learning time.

    “This could be due to time delays in the effect of extension participation as the herd calving rate is determined by complex practices that do not give an immediate and observable return and require more learning time (Foster and Rosenzweig, 2010;Kuehne et al., 2017;Montes de Oca Munguia and Llewellyn, 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Botha, N., Sinclair, S., James, A., Blackett, P., Brazendale, R., Dirks, S., Lambert, G., Kaine, G., 2015. Estimating the economic impact of a co-innovation approach: THE case of dairy heifer rearing in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of Impacts of Agricultural Research Conference. INRA, Paris Available at: http://www.beyondresults.co.nz/ PrimaryInnovation/Documents/Botha%20et%20al%202015.pdf.
  2. Cary, J., Webb, T., Barr, N., 2002. Understanding landholders' capacity to change to sustainable practices. In: Insights About Practice Adoption and Social Capacity for Change. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, pp. 1-67.
  3. Condon, R., Sippel, A., 1992. Productivity of oldman saltbush in relation to rainfall and economic considerations. In: Proc. 6th Aust. Agron. Conf. Armidale. Aust Soc. Agron, pp. 150-153.
  4. James, J., Coutts, J., Gururajan, R., 2015. It's all about the benefits: why extension pro- fessionals adopt Web 2.0 technologies. Rural Ext. Innov. Syst. J. 11 (1), 72-82.
  5. Lindner, R., 1987. Adoption and diffusion of technology: an overview. In: Champ, B., Highley, E., Remenyi, J. (Eds.), Technological Change in Postharvest Handling and Transportation of Grains in the Humid Tropics. ACIAR, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 144-151.
  6. Young, N., 2003. Western Australia no-tillage farmers association. In: Garcia-Torres, L., Benites, J., Martinez-Vilela, A., Holgado-Cabrera, A. (Eds.), Conservation Agriculture: Environment, Farmers Experiences, Innovations, Socio-economy. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 155-158.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuehne, G., Llewellyn, R., Pannell, D. J., Wilkinson, R., Dolling, P., Ouzman, J., & Ewing, M.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Department of Economic Development Jobs Transport and Resources (AU)
  • Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (AU)
  • Institut des Systèmes Complexes Paris Île-de-France (FR)
Corresponding author
Llewellyn, Rick
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
156
Pages
115-125
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2717963309
Cited by
367
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 1
FWCI
68.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Grains Research and Development Corporation
  • Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
  • CSIRO
  • University of Western Australia
  • Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CE11E0083)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
Keywords
technology adoption, agricultural practices, diffusion of innovations, ADOPT, relative advantage, risk perception, farmer networks, ease of learning, diffusion curves, agricultural extension, agricultural policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review