The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review: Occupational risks for voice problems
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a cohesive review of the literature regarding the functional consequences of voice problems and occupational risk factors for them. The salient points are as follows. According to conservative estimates, approximately 28,000,000 workers in the US experience daily voice problems. Many people who experience voice problems perceive them to have a negative impact on their work and their quality of life. Estimates based on empirical data suggest that, considering only lost work days and treatment expenses, the societal cost of voice problems in teachers alone may be of the order of about $2.5 billion annually in the US. In fact, across several countries, "teacher" consistently emerges as the common occupation most likely to seek otorhinolaryngological (ORL) evaluation for a voice problem. Other occupational categories likely to seek ORL examination for a voice problem are singer, counselor/social worker, lawyer, and clergy. Finally, US Census data indicate that keyboard operators may be at special risk for voice problems because of a near-epidemic growth of repetitive strain injury (RSI), which can adversely affect the voice especially when speech recognition software is implemented. This paper discusses frequency data, quality of life data, and treatment considerations for these voice-related occupational issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Cited by
Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) (Update)
Stachler, R. J., Francis, D. O., Schwartz, S. R., Damask, C. C., Digoy, G. P., Krouse, H. J., McCoy, S. J., Ouellette, D. R., Patel, R. R., Reavis, C. (. W., et al. (2018) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599817751030 · Cited by 368
Van Houtte, E., Claeys, S., Wuyts, F., & Van Lierde, K. (2011) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.04.008 · Cited by 290
The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Occupational Voice Disorders in Teachers
Sliwinska-Kowalska, M., Niebudek-Bogusz, E., Fiszer, M., Los-Spychalska, T., Kotylo, P., Sznurowska-Przygocka, B., & Modrzewska, M. (2006) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000089610 · Cited by 273
A Psychological Cascade Model for Persisting Voice Problems in Teachers
de Jong, F. I. C. R. S., Cornelis, B. E., Wuyts, F. L., Kooijman, P. G. C., Schutte, H. K., Oudes, M. J., & Graamans, K. (2003) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000070091 · Cited by 43
Correlation of VHI-30 to Acoustic Measurements Across Three Common Voice Disorders
Dehqan, A., Yadegari, F., Scherer, R. C., & Dabirmoghadam, P. (2017) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.016 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Verdolini, K., & Ramig, L. O.
- Venue
- Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-46
- ISSN
- 1401-5439 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2022
- OpenAlex
- W2152292809
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review: Occupational risks for voice problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14015430119969
- The paper
- Verdolini, K., & Ramig, L. O. (2001). Review: Occupational risks for voice problems. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430119969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.