Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) (Update)
Abstract
Objective This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on treating patients who present with dysphonia, which is characterized by altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication and/or quality of life. Dysphonia affects nearly one-third of the population at some point in its life. This guideline applies to all age groups evaluated in a setting where dysphonia would be identified or managed. It is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and treat patients with dysphonia. Purpose The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve the quality of care for patients with dysphonia, based on current best evidence. Expert consensus to fill evidence gaps, when used, is explicitly stated and supported with a detailed evidence profile for transparency. Specific objectives of the guideline are to reduce inappropriate variations in care, produce optimal health outcomes, and minimize harm. For this guideline update, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of advanced practice nursing, bronchoesophagology, consumer advocacy, family medicine, geriatric medicine, internal medicine, laryngology, neurology, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, pediatrics, professional voice, pulmonology, and speech-language pathology. Action Statements The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following key action statements (KASs): (1) Clinicians should ass…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-based acoustic analysis offers a non-invasive adjunctive approach for voice quality diagnosis, triage, and follow-up.
“artificial intelligence (AI)-based acoustic analysis offers a non-invasive adjunctive approach for VQ diagnosis, triage, and follow-up [20,21,22,23,24].”
From Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Shared decision making — The pinnacle of patient-centered care
Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1109283 · Cited by 3,433 · see citing works
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222 · see citing works
Classifying Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guidelines
Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1260 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Berke, G. S., Verneil, A., Blackwell, K. E., Jackson, K. S., Gerratt, B. R., & Sercarz, J. A. (1999) · Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/000348949910800302 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Theodoros, D. G., Hill, A. J., & Russell, T. G. (2016) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2015_ajslp-15-0005 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
The Mayo Clinic Arizona Spasmodic Dysphonia Experience: A Demographic Analysis of 718 Patients
Patel, A. B., Bansberg, S. F., Adler, C. H., Lott, D. G., & Crujido, L. (2015) · Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/0003489415588557 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Diagnostic Delays and Errors in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Opportunities for Improvement
Franco, J., Elghouche, A. N., Harris, M. S., & Kokoska, M. S. (2017) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1177/1062860616638413 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lechien, J. R., Geneid, A., Bohlender, J. E., Cantarella, G., Avellaneda, J. C., Desuter, G., Sjogren, E. V., Finck, C., Hans, S., Hess, M., et al. (2023) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-023-08211-6 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Hu, H.-C., Chang, S.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Li, K.-J., Cho, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-T., Lu, C.-J., Tsai, T.-P., & Lee, O. K.-S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25247 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Zhu, P., Qiu, W., Guo, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12783 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Low, D. M., Rao, V., Randolph, G., Song, P. C., & Ghosh, S. S. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000516 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hirose, K., Asano, K., Sakaguchi, M., Nagao, A., Nakahira, M., Doi, N., Kobayashi, T., & Hyodo, M. (2021) · Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/lio2.669 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Harnessing machine learning in diagnosing complex hoarseness cases
Roitman, A., Edelstain, Y., Katzir, C., Ofir, H., Peleg, N., Doweck, I., & Yanir, Y. (2025) · American Journal of Otolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104533 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Vrba, J., Steinbach, J., Jirsa, T., Verde, L., De Fazio, R., Zeng, Y., Ichiji, K., Hájek, L., Sedláková, Z., Urbániová, Z., et al. (2025) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.028 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Lima-Filho, L. M. A., Lopes, L. W., & Filho, T. D. M. E. S. (2024) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.002 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review
Mairesse, S., Maniaci, A., Briganti, G., & Lechien, J. R. (2026) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm16060301 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stachler, R. J., Francis, D. O., Schwartz, S. R., Damask, C. C., Digoy, G. P., Krouse, H. J., McCoy, S. J., Ouellette, D. R., Patel, R. R., Reavis, C. (. W., Smith, L. J., Smith, M., Strode, S. W., Woo, P., & Nnacheta, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Virginia Mason Medical Center (US)
- Private practice Lake Mary Florida USA
- Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US)
- The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- National Spasmodic Dysphonia Association Itasca Illinois USA
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Private practice Sherwood Arkansas USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- American Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stachler, Robert J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S1-S42
- ISSN
- 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 0194-5998
- 1097-6817
- OpenAlex
- W2789416342
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2018-03-20)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
- Keywords
- dysphonia, hoarseness, voice therapy, laryngoscopy, laryngeal cancer screening, laryngeal cancer, laryngeal stenosis, laryngeal reconstruction, laryngectomy, laryngeal nerve injury, professional voice users, voice quality, quality of life, endotracheal intubation
- MeSH terms
- Hoarseness, Humans, Dysphonia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review