Contribution of Swedish moist snuff to the metabolic syndrome: A wolf in sheep's clothing?
Abstract
Aim: Combined effects of genetic and environmental factors underlie the clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in the metabolic syndrome (MetSy). The aim was to investigate associations between several lifestyle factors and MetSy, with a focus on the possible role of smokeless tobacco in the form of Swedish moist snuff (snus). Methods: A population-based longitudinal cohort study within the Västerbotten Intervention Programme in Northern Sweden. All inhabitants at the ages of 30, 40, 50, and 60 are invited to participate in a health survey that includes a questionnaire on psychosocial conditions and lifestyle and measurement of biological variables. Individuals examined in 1990—94 (n=24,230) and who also returned for follow-up after 10 years were included (total of 16,492 individuals: 46.6% men and 53.4% women). Regression analyses were performed. MetSy was the outcome and analyses were adjusted for age, sex, alcohol abuse, and family history of CVD and diabetes. Results: Ten-year development of MetSy was associated with high-dose consumption of snus at baseline (OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.26—2.15]), low education (2.2 [1.92—2.63]), physical inactivity (1.5 [1.22—1.73]) and former smoking (1.2 [1.06—1.38]). Snus was associated with separate components of MetSy, including triglycerides (1.6, 1.30—1.95), obesity (1.7 [1.36—2.18]) but not hypertension, dysglycemia and low HDL cholesterol. Conclusions: MetSy is independently associated with high consumption of snus, even when controlling for smoking status. The finding is of public health interest in societies with widespread use of snus. More research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying this effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consumption of high doses of snus at baseline is associated with increased odds of metabolic disorder (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.26-2.15), elevated triglycerides (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.30-1.95), and obesity (OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.36-2.18) compared to never using snus.
“consumption of high-doses of snus at baseline was associated with increased odds of metabolic disorder (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.26-2.15)compared to never using snus.Furthermore, using snus was associated with increased odds of elevated triglycerides (OR = 1.6; 95%CI: 1.30-1.95)and obesity (OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.36-2.18)(Norberg et al. 2006).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Norberg et al. 2006
Cites
Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Associated With the Metabolic Syndrome
Isomaa, B., Almgren, P., Tuomi, T., Forsén, B., Lahti, K., Nissén, M., Taskinen, M.-R., & Groop, L. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.4.683 · Cited by 4,760 · see citing works
Grundy, S. M., Cleeman, J. I., Daniels, S. R., Donato, K. A., Eckel, R. H., Franklin, B. A., Gordon, D. J., Krauss, R. M., Savage, P. J., Smith, S. C., et al. (2005) · Cardiology in Review · doi:10.1097/01.crd.0000380842.14048.7e · Cited by 1,600 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Norberg, M., Stenlund, H., Lindahl, B., Boman, K., & Weinehall, L.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 576-583
- ISSN
- 1403-4948
- 1651-1905
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review