Cited by 37Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChronic Disease Management StrategiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC): original article

Eriksen, Camilla Ihlebæk, H, Hege·1999·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14034949950153931

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksen, C. I.
Corresponding author
Eriksen, Camilla Ihlebæk, H, Hege
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
1999-04-15
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
63-72
ISSN
1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972436487
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
subjective health complaints, scoring system, health-related quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, questionnaire development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review