Cited by 86Architecture and Computational DesignDesign Education and PracticeDigital Media and Visual Art

Using Generative AI Midjourney to enhance divergent and convergent thinking in an architect’s creative design process

Open access
Tan, Linus, Luhrs, Max·2024·The Design Journal

Abstract

Architects use a range of tools, from the traditional pencil to Virtual Reality technologies to prototype and articulate their creative designs. In recent years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) software has reached the mainstream and there is an exponential appearance of GenAI images that portray architectural designs. This article documents an architectural design methodology that uses Midjourney, a text-to-image GenAI software, as a design tool that enhances architects’ creativity. Prompted by a design brief, we used Midjourney to accelerate (1) the identification and refinement process of developing a prospective user and (2) the ideation process of creating different desirable spaces for the designed user.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14606925.2024.2353479

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The social dimensions of creative AI platforms are increasingly recognized as central to user motivation and engagement.

    “As indicated by recent developments in the generative AI field—such as Suno CEO's vision of seeing Suno as a form of social media [69], and OpenAI's plans to develop social media capabilities potentially influenced by GPT-4o's successful image generation feature [58]—the social dimensions of creative AI platforms are increasingly recognized as central to user motivation and engagement.”

    From Exploring the Collaborative Co-Creation Process with AI: A Case Study in Novice Music Production (2025) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Background and Results sections discuss Midjourney’s role in architects’ creative thinking, not the social features of creative AI platforms or their effect on user motivation and engagement. Searches for social interaction, community, motivation, and engagement found no passage addressing that claim; the copy provides no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Luhrs, M., and L. Tan. 2022. "Incorporating Artificial Intelligence Generated Visualisations in the Architectural Design Process." In Architecture, Media, Politics and Society: Representing Pasts Visioning Futures Conference, Online, December 1. https://amps- research.com/event/visioning/schedule/digitality-architecture-urban-space/incorporating- artificial-intelligence-generated-visualisations-in-the-architectural-design-process/
  2. Torrance, E. P. 1962. "Testing and Creative Talent." Educational Leadership 20 (1): 7-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, L., & Luhrs, M.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Tan, Linus
Venue
The Design Journal
Published
2024-05-13
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
677-699
ISSN
  • 1460-6925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-3062
OpenAlex
W4396865862
Cited by
70
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 5
FWCI
260.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Design Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
Keywords
Midjourney, generative AI, architectural design process, divergent thinking, convergent thinking, creative design, text-to-image generation, idea generation, user identification, AI-assisted design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review