The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using health impact assessments to implement the sustainable development goals in practice: a case study in Wales
Open accessAbstract
Welsh Government’s (WG) Wellbeing of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 (Welsh Government 2015) is a unique legislation which demonstrates its commitment to sustainable development. It is the only global legislation that enshrines the UNs Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) within it. It emphasises WGs commitment to a ‘Health in All Policies’ approach to policymaking by emphasising the sustainable development principle is integrated to address seven Wellbeing Goals. Two of these goals are focussed on health and (in)equality which ties them distinctly to the practice of Health Impact Assessment (HIA). The World Health Organisation recommends the use of HIA to achieve the SDGs but not how to practically do this. This paper describes a HIA undertaken on a proposed major electricity cable connection development in Wales. It discusses how this HIA was the catalyst for considered thinking about the HIA process and how it can be used to consider and implement the Well-being Goals in practice, and initiates further thinking about how this can be extended to implement and address the SDGs at a local, regional and national level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plusieurs facteurs ont été identifiés comme défavorables au succès de l'EIS : politiques ou projets controversés, non-partage des valeurs de l'EIS par les parties prenantes, refus de transparence, écarts importants entre les cultures organisationnelles, non-disponibilité des données, temporalité de l'EIS inadéquate avec la prise de décision, manque de temps, de ressources et de compétences.
“Plusieurs facteurs ont été identifiés comme défavorables, notamment les politiques ou projets controversés, le non-partage des valeurs de l'EIS par les parties prenantes, le refus de transparence, des écarts importants entre les cultures organisationnelles, la non-disponibilité des données, une temporalité de l'EIS inadéquate avec laprise de décision ou encore le manque de temps, de ressources”
From L’évaluation d’impact sur la santé pour scruter et sculpter les politiques (2021) · cites this paper as [37]
La section « Better and Continued Involvement with local residents » (page non indiquée) souligne le besoin de transparence et signale que certaines informations étaient insuffisamment détaillées; « A more equal Wales » indique aussi que la communication ouverte aide à surmonter les conflits. Ces passages ne présentent toutefois pas la liste annoncée de facteurs défavorables au succès de l’EIS : ils ne constatent ni refus de transparence ni absence générale de données, et ne traitent pas du désaccord sur les valeurs, des cultures organisationnelles, du calendrier décisionnel ou du manque de temps, de ressources et de compétences. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
O’Mara-Eves, A., Brunton, G., McDaid, D., Oliver, S. R., Kavanagh, J., Jamal, F., Matosevic, T., Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2013) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr01040 · Cited by 444
Neighborhood Environments and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mental Well-Being
Mitchell, R., Richardson, E. A., Shortt, N., & Pearce, J. R. (2015) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.017 · Cited by 414
Vienneau, D., de Hoogh, K., Faeh, D., Kaufmann, M., Wunderli, J. M., & Röösli, M. (2017) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.012 · Cited by 282
Distance to Green Space and Physical Activity: A Danish National Representative Survey
Toftager, M., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U. K., Bentsen, P., Grønbæk, M., Randrup, T. B., & Kamper‐Jørgensen, F. (2011) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.8.6.741 · Cited by 167
MacGregor, D. G., Slovic, P., & Morgan, M. G. (1994) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00293.x · Cited by 134
Health impact assessment of traffic noise in Madrid (Spain)
Tobı́as, A., Recio, A., Díaz, J., & Linares, C. (2014) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.011 · Cited by 122
Petrović, M. D., Vujko, A., Gajić, T., et al. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010054 · Cited by 111
Public Health Impact of Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields
Kheifets, L., Afifi, A. A., & Shimkhada, R. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8977 · Cited by 102
Rückert, A., Schram, A., Labonté, R., Friel, S., Gleeson, D., & Thow, A. M. (2016) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2016.1178379 · Cited by 71
Schnitzer, S., Bellis, M. A., Anderson, Z., Hughes, K. E., Calafat, A., Juan, M., & Kokkevi, A. (2009) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260509340549 · Cited by 69
Pinto, A. D., Molnar, A., Shankardass, K., O'Campo, P. J., & Bayoumi, A. M. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1350-0 · Cited by 42
Delany, T., Harris, P. J., Williams, C., et al. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-699 · Cited by 37
Chadderton, C., Elliott, E., Hacking, N., Shepherd, M., & Williams, G. H. (2012) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/das031 · Cited by 37
HIA in Switzerland: strategies for achieving Health in All Policies: Fig. 1:
Mattig, T., Cantoreggi, N., Simos, J., et al. (2015) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dav087 · Cited by 11
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mattig T, 2017, Health Promotion Int, 32, 149
- O’Mara-Eyes A, 2013, Public Health Res, 1, 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current Global Health Impact Assessment Practice
Winkler, M. S., Furu, P., Viliani, F., Cave, B., Divall, M., Ramesh, G., Harris-Roxas, B., & Knoblauch, A. M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17092988 · Cited by 85
L’évaluation d’impact sur la santé pour scruter et sculpter les politiques
Jabot, F. (2021) · Santé Publique · doi:10.3917/spub.211.0007 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, L., Gray, B. J., & Ashton, K.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Public Health Wales (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Green, Liz
- Venue
- Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-10-22
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 214-224
- ISSN
- 1461-5517 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5465
- OpenAlex
- W2981470675
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- health impact assessment, Sustainable Development Goals, Health in All Policies, health disparities, sustainable development, Wales, policy implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
