The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective
Open accessAbstract
This article focuses on the caring function of the family in child care and elderly care and follows a comparative as well as a gender perspective. It aims at developing a gender-sensitive theoretical concept of familialism which allows to identify real world variations of familialism. Four ideal types of familialism are distinguished and care policies in the EU member states are classified according to them. It can be shown that countries cluster differently for different care policies. In addition, structural gender effects of the four ideal types of familialism are reflected upon. The empirical analysis of paid parental leave in nine EU member states gives an example of gendered and de-gendered variants of familialism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198742002.001.0001 · Cited by 6,253
European Social Care Services: Is It Possible To Identify Models ?
Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (1996) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/095892879600600201 · Cited by 672
Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Toward Inclusive Citizenship
KNIJN, T., & KREMER, M. (1997) · Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.sp.a034270 · Cited by 495
Family, State and Social Policy
Harding, L. F. (1996) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24377-8 · Cited by 79
Cited by
CAN WE IDENTIFY INTERGENERATIONAL POLICY REGIMES IN EUROPE?
Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2010) · European Societies · doi:10.1080/14616696.2010.483006 · Cited by 527
Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2013) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7 · Cited by 182
Why women own less housing assets in China? The role of intergenerational transfers
Deng, W. J., Hoekstra, J. S. C. M., & Elsinga, M. G. (2019) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1007/s10901-018-9619-0 · Cited by 54
“…states (with exceptions in Scandinavia) are still based on the male breadwinner model in which the male workers receive a “family wage” to support their wives staying at home and doing unpaid house and care works (O’Connor 1993; Orloff 1993; Esping-Andersen 1990, 1999; Lewis 2002; Leitner 2003).”
BackgroundAn analysis of carer burden among family carers of people with and without dementia in Ireland
Teahan, Á., Lafferty, A., Cullinan, J., Fealy, G., & O’Shea, E. (2021) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610220000769 · Cited by 39
Neyer, G., Hoem, J. M., & Andersson, G. (2017) · Demographic Research Monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_9 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Leitner, S.
- Venue
- European Societies
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-375
- ISSN
- 1461-6696 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8307
- OpenAlex
- W2056104262
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1461669032000127642
- The paper
- Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
