Cited by 46Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

Old and new internal working models of attachment: The organization of feelings and language

Grossmann, Klaus E.·1999·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

Old internal working models of attachment are based on the organization of feelings and behavior which develop on the basis of parents' sensitivity to infants' and young children's attachment and exploratory needs. New internal working models reflect the process of language discourses with older and wiser conversation partners during the many subsequent years of immaturity. It is proposed that successful linguistic co-construction of internal coherence of attachment emotions and their external correspondence may lead to secure states of mind even in cases of less than optimal early attachment experiences--and vice versa. Attachment theory needs to address the problem of how early secure or insecure organizations of attachment emotions interact with the later construction of mature internal working models through language discourse with others, and with what emotional outcome. This would help to solve the theoretical paradox between continuity--unchangeable determinism from early infancy--and non-continuity--irrelevancy of early attachment experiences for later states of mind.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616739900134141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attachment style influences affective, cognitive, and linguistic functions.

    “Attachment style not only constitutes a model of relationships with others, but also influences affective, cognitive, and linguistic functions (Grossmann, 1999;van IJzendoorn et al., 1995).”

    From The Role of Personality in Language Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Grossmann, 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossmann, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Grossmann, Klaus E.
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
1999-12
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
253-269
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W2106897936
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
internal working models, attachment, language discourse, secure attachment, insecure attachment, parental sensitivity, attachment theory, emotional development
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Humans, Infant, Internal-External Control, Language Development, Life Change Events, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review