The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic purity test of F1hybrid Capsicum using molecular analysis
Abstract
SummaryA fast and accurate genetic purity test of F1 hybrid plants is essential for seed production and accelerating advanced breeding generations in breeding programmes. DNA technology has great potential for enhancing purity assessment of hybrids. Genetic purity of three F1 chili hybrids was determined using two molecular marker techniques RAPD and ISSR. RAPD analysis successfully detected all three F1 hybridity, while ISSR detected only two. This was due to the RAPD marker system producing a greater number of markers than the ISSR system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anthracnose resistance to C. capsici was expressed in the interspecific cross of Thai susceptible C. annuum cv. 'Bangchang' and anthracnose resistant C. chinense 'CM 021'.
“Mongkolporn et al.(2004a) carried out a genetic study of anthracnose resistance to C. capsici, which was expressed in the interspecific cross of Thai susceptible C. annuum cv.'Bangchang' and an-thracnose resistant C. chinense 'CM 021'.”
From Chilli anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species (2008) · cites this paper as Mongkolporn et al.(2004a)
Mongkolporn et al. (2004a) studied the inheritance of resistance to anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum capsici in a Capsicum annuum population established from a cross between accession '83-168' and cv. 'KKU-Cluster', and their progenies.
“Recently in Thailand, Mongkolporn et al.(2004a) have studied the inheritance of resistance to anthracnose specifically caused by Colletotrichum capsici, in a Capsicum annuum population established from a cross between accession '83-168' and cv.'KKU-Cluster', and their progenies.”
From Chilli anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species (2008) · cites this paper as Mongkolporn et al.(2004a)
They observed a promising dominant gene responsible for the resistance to C. capsici.
“They observed a promising dominant gene responsible for the resistance to C. capsici.”
From Chilli anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species (2008) · cites this paper as Mongkolporn et al.(2004a)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chilli anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum species
Than, P. P., Prihastuti, H., Phoulivong, S., Taylor, P. W. J., & Hyde, K. D. (2008) · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B · doi:10.1631/jzus.b0860007 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Mongkolporn, O., Dokmaihom, Y., Kanchana-Udomkan, C., & Pakdeevaraporn, P.
- Affiliations
- Kasetsart University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Mongkolporn, O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-451
- ISSN
- 1462-0316 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-4084
- OpenAlex
- W165758577
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Keywords
- genetic purity, F1 hybrids, Capsicum, chili pepper, RAPD markers, ISSR markers, molecular markers, seed production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review