Cited by 16Plant Gene Expression AnalysisPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Response of the phenylpropanoid pathway to Venturia inaequalis infection in maturing fruit of ‘Braeburn’ apple

Ana, Slatnar, Maja, Mikulic Petkovsek, Haidrun, Halbwirth, Franci, Stampar, Karl, Stich, Robert, Veberic·2010·The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Abstract

SummaryThis study investigated the activities of key enzymes in the phenylpropanoid pathway and the accumulation of phenolic products in apple peel in response to infection with Venturia inaequalis [(Cooke) G. Wint.]. We compared healthy apple peel with apple peel showing symptomatic scab lesions, and with peel tissue from 1 – 2 mm around the scab lesions in fruit 1 month before maturity [140 d after full bloom (DAFB)] and at physiological maturity (175 DAFB). Infection with V. inaequalis enhanced the synthesis of some phenolic compounds. Compared to healthy peel, scab lesion tissue had ≤ 3.1-times higher hydroxycinnamic acid content, ≤ 1.3-times higher dihydrochalcone content, and ≤ 3.9-times higher flavan-3-ol content. Scab lesions showed slightly higher phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, chalcone synthase, chalcone isomerase, flavonol synthase, and dihydroflavonol 4-reductase activities. The total amount of phenolics remained relatively stable between the two sampling dates, except for epicatechin and caffeic acid which decreased in amount toward fruit maturity, and levels of catechin which increased in more mature fruit. During fruit maturation, only chalcone synthase and chalcone isomerase activities decreased in all tissues examined. This study showed that the phenylpropanoid pathway in apple fruit peel changed significantly following infection with the apple scab pathogen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14620316.2010.11512699

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ana, S., Maja, M. P., Haidrun, H., Franci, S., Karl, S., & Robert, V.
Affiliations
TU Wien (AT)
Venue
The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
Published
2010-01
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
465-472
ISSN
  • 1462-0316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2380-4084
OpenAlex
W2307451993
Cited by
16
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Gene Expression Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
phenylpropanoid pathway, Venturia inaequalis, apple scab, Braeburn apple, fruit peel, fruit ripening, phenolic compounds, hydroxycinnamic acids, dihydrochalcones, flavan-3-ols, chalcone synthase, chalcone isomerase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, flavonol synthase, dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, epicatechin, caffeic acid, catechins, plant-pathogen interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review