Cited by 14Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Disease resistance of ‘Zill’and ‘Keitt’mango fruit to anthracnose in relation to defence enzyme activities and the content of anti-fungal substances

Gong, D. Q., Zhu, S.J., Gu, H., Zhang, L. B., Hong, K. Q., Xie, J. H.·2013·The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Abstract

SummaryMango (Magnifera indica L.) is a popular fruit, but it is susceptible to post-harvest diseases. To study the resistance of mango fruit to anthracnose disease and the possible defence mechanisms involved, the resistance of two mango cultivars (‘Zill’ and ‘Keitt’) was examined in relation to their defence enzyme systems. The results showed that in both young or commercially mature fruit inoculated with Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, lesion sizes on ‘Keitt’ fruit were smaller than on ‘Zill’ fruit. For non-inoculated fruit harvested at commercial maturity, the disease index of ‘Keitt’ was lower than that of ‘Zill’. This indicates that ‘Keitt’ was more disease resistant than ‘Zill’. Compared with ‘Zill’, ‘Keitt’ fruit showed higher phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (POD), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activities during development and storage, as well as elevated levels of H2O2, total phenolic compounds and lignin during development, and higher contents of H2O2 and lignin in harvested fruit early during storage. These results suggest that defence enzymes and compounds plays important roles in the resistance of mango fruit to anthracnose disease and could be used as indicators to screen for mango cultivars that are more resistant to post-harvest diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14620316.2013.11512962

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Gong, D. Q., Zhu, S. J., Gu, H., Zhang, L. B., Hong, K. Q., & Xie, J. H.
Affiliations
  • South China Agricultural University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, S.J.
Venue
The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
Published
2013-01
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
243-250
ISSN
  • 1462-0316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2380-4084
OpenAlex
W2314365481
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
mango, anthracnose, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, disease resistance, cultivar resistance, Keitt, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, hydrogen peroxide, lignin, total phenolic compounds, postharvest disease, fruit storage, disease index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disease resistance of ‘Zill’and ‘Keitt’mango fruit to anthracnose in relation to defence enzyme activities and the content of anti-fungal substances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14620316.2013.11512962
The paper
Gong, D. Q., Zhu, S. J., Gu, H., Zhang, L. B., Hong, K. Q., & Xie, J. H. (2013). Disease resistance of ‘Zill’and ‘Keitt’mango fruit to anthracnose in relation to defence enzyme activities and the content of anti-fungal substances. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2013.11512962