The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extent of smoking and nicotine dependence in the United States: 19911993
Abstract
Rates of nicotine dependence vary in different sociodemographic groups in the population. These group differences remain to be understood. The objective of this study is to specify the relationship between cigarette consumption and nicotine dependence and whether group differences are explained by quantity smoked or differential sensitivity to nicotine. The data used derived from National Household Surveys on Drug Abuse (1991-1993), multistage area probability samples of the US population 12 years old and over, and anonymous structured household interviews, considering subjects who were last-month smokers (12,550 White, 4903 Black, 4839 Hispanic). The main outcome measure was last-year nicotine dependence based on symptoms of dependence and drug-related problems approximating DSM-IV dependence criteria. Rates are higher among females than males, Whites than minorities and the lowest among older adults. Dependence rates increase sharply up to half a pack of cigarettes smoked per day. At higher quantities, the increased risk for dependence is minimal. The higher rate of dependence among females than males results from a greater number of symptoms at the same quantity smoked. The similarity of adolescent and middle-adult rates results from the fact that adolescents smoke significantly fewer cigarettes than adults, but experience higher rates of dependence at the same levels of use. Although adults 50 and over are the heaviest smokers, they experience the lowest rates of dependence because of hypothesized lower sensitivity to increased quantity of nicotine intake. The higher rates among Whites than Blacks appear to result from heavier smoking and greater sensitivity to nicotine effects. It was concluded that adolescents, women and Whites are particularly vulnerable to becoming dependent on nicotine. Group-specific thresholds may be more appropriate criteria than an absolute threshold to define the risk for nicotine dependence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“adolescents experience symptoms of dependence at lower levels of nicotine exposure than adults.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [241]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chambers, R. A., Taylor, J. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1041 · Cited by 1,719
“Despite smoking fewer cigarettes than adults, adolescents show higher rates of dependence at similar levels of use (20), and although rates of alcohol use are similar throughout adolescence and adulthood, rates of abuse/dependence vary inversely with age (5).”
BackgroundVariants in Nicotinic Receptors and Risk for Nicotine Dependence
Bierut, L. J., Stitzel, J. A., Wang, J. C., Hinrichs, A. L., Grucza, R. A., Xuei, X., Saccone, N. L., Saccone, S. F., Bertelsen, S., Fox, L., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111711 · Cited by 648
“Interestingly, African Americans have a lower prevalence of nicotine dependence than European Americans (44, 45), and this may be explained in part by the low prevalence of this risk allele in populations of African descent.”
BackgroundDrug addiction: the neurobiology of behaviour gone awry
Volkow, N. D., & Li, T. (2004) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1539 · Cited by 638
Motivational Influences on Cigarette Smoking
Baker, T. B., Brandon, T. H., & Chassin, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142054 · Cited by 363
“Kandel & Chen (2000) used a proxy measure to approximate DSM-IV diagnoses in the NHSDA data.”
BackgroundMethodPublic Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (2015) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/18997 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, D. B. K.
- Venue
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-274
- ISSN
- 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-994X
- OpenAlex
- W2170400987
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01da009110-10)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH30906)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA00081, DA 09110)
- NIH Clinical Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Keywords
- nicotine dependence, cigarette smoking, sociodemographic differences, sex differences, racial and ethnic differences, age differences, nicotine sensitivity, adolescents, women, older adults, drug-related problems, risk thresholds
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, Time Factors, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review