Cited by 52Smoking Behavior and CessationImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

The immunogenicity and safety of a nicotine vaccine in smokers and nonsmokers: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial

Wagena, Edwin, de Vos, Arjen, Horwith, Gary, van Schayck, Constant·2008·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

This randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of four doses of a nicotine vaccine in smokers and nonsmokers. Subjects were 21 smokers and 9 nonsmokers in good physical and mental health. They were aged 24-60 years, were recruited from the general public using newspaper advertisements, and were evaluated at University Hospital Maastricht. Each volunteer received four spaced intramuscular injections of 100 microg of purified 3'-aminomethylnicotine conjugated to detoxified Pseudomonas aeruginosa r-exoprotein A or placebo both adsorbed to 800 microg aluminum into the deltoid muscle of alternating arms. Clinical safety was determined by vital signs, reactogenicity, and adverse events, and immunogenicity was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Intensive follow-up for 266 days revealed the vaccine to be well tolerated. We found no significant differences in adverse events between the vaccine and placebo groups. Significant increases in the geometric mean titer (GMT) levels of nicotine-specific antibodies were observed from 7 days after the second vaccination (day 21), reaching nicotine-specific antibody levels of at least 8 microg/ml in half of the subjects (50%) at day 49. A fourth dose administered at day 182 significantly boosted waning antibody levels to a GMT of 10.8 microg/ml at day 217 (95% CI 6.0-19.3). Results showed that the immunogenicity of the vaccine was not impeded by the presence of nicotine. These observations provide evidence in humans that the vaccine we used may represent a feasible strategy for evoking type-specific antibodies against nicotine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14622200701704921

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagena, E., de Vos, A., Horwith, G., & van Schayck, C.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2008
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
213-218
ISSN
1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103474101
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
nicotine vaccine, immunogenicity, vaccine safety, smokers, non-smokers, alum adjuvant, antibody waning, smoking cessation, reactogenicity
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Antibodies, Antibody Formation, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Vaccination, Vaccines, Synthetic, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review