Cited by 18School Health and Nursing EducationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Implementing a school drug education programme: Reflections on fidelity

McBride, Nyanda, Farringdon, Fiona, Midford, Richard·2002·International Journal of Health Promotion and Education

Abstract

A major concern in gaining accurate information about the effectiveness of health education programmes, including drug education, is the issue of fidelity of implementation. The School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP), a longitudinal research study incorporating a series of lessons, is used to illustrate fidelity issues. The various methods adopted to optimise and measure the fidelity of SHAHRP implementation served several purposes: teacher training assisted in skilling and informing teachers about the importance of fidelity rigour; teacher self-report data documented the extent of completion for each activity; assessment of selected activities in student workbooks provided quantitative information about fidelity; and student self-assessment and in-depth interviews with teachers provided insight into teachers' and students' level of involvement in SHAHRP.These methods provided a rich amount of data that were then analysed using statistical means, so that implementation could be analysed against other study measures. Descriptive analysis was also undertaken so that deeper understanding of issues affecting implementation could be clearly identified. A balance of measures that meet the research requirements while also maintaining the support and goodwill of school based staff is necessary for measurement of implementation in naturalistic settings such as schools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14635240.2002.10806196

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-report is the most common means of evaluating the responsiveness of all participants to an intervention.

    “Self-report is the most common means of evaluating the responsiveness of all participants to an intervention [30-34,37].”

    From A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity (2007) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McBride, N., Farringdon, F., & Midford, R.
Affiliations
National Drug Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
McBride, Nyanda
Venue
International Journal of Health Promotion and Education
Published
2002-01
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
40-50
ISSN
  • 1463-5240 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-9545
OpenAlex
W1969260511
Cited by
18
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Health Promotion and Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Healthway
  • National Drug Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
drug education, implementation fidelity, school-based health education, teacher professional development, student self-assessment, teacher self-report, student workbook, alcohol harm reduction, naturalistic settings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review