Computer‐based and Face‐to‐face Collaborative Argumentation in Secondary Schools in England and Finland
Abstract
This article focuses on the analysis of secondary school students’ argumentative interactions in England and Finland, within specific face‐to‐face and computer‐based environments. We propose that a combination of learning environments, in conjunction with teacher input and support, is important for developing argumentation skills in the classroom. Face‐to‐face argumentation, in particular, offers ample opportunity for concentrating on the quality (through deeper exploration) of arguments; such learning can enhance the construction of well‐structured arguments often associated with some computer‐based environments, such as synchronous computer chat.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several interventions have shown that dialogic activities transfer to individual writing tasks.
“Several interventions developed in academic contexts have shown the transfer of the dialogic activities to individual writing tasks (Crowell & Kuhn, 2014;Kuhn & Crowell, 2011;Litosseliti et al., 2005;Reznitskaya et al., 2001).”
From Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education (2021) · cites this paper as Litosseliti et al., 2005
Cites
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Troy, J. (2005) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80802-8_11 · Cited by 1,654 · see citing works
Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches
Jones, A. C. (2000) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(00)00011-7 · Cited by 1,506 · see citing works
Collaborative learning : cognitive and computational approaches
Dillenbourg, P. (1999) · Cited by 1,321 · see citing works
The Guided Construction of Knowledge
Mercer, N. (1995) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781800418288 · Cited by 940 · see citing works
The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners
Mercer, N. (1995) · Cited by 873 · see citing works
Intentional Learning as a Goal of Instruction
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-12 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of the Research Literature
Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1995.11678923 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
On-Line Forums[1]: New Platforms for Professional Development and Group Collaboration
Anderson, T. D., & Kanuka, H. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00078.x · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments
Marttunen, M. J., & Laurinen, L. I. (2001) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/a:1003931514884 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationNewman, D. R. (1996) · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Group Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication Media
Olaniran, B. A. (1994) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318994007003002 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Blended Learning as a Strategy to Improve Collaborative Task Performance
Schweizer, K., Paechter, M., & Weidenmann, B. (2003) · Journal of Educational Television · doi:10.1080/1358165032000165699 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Interacting with computer-based simulation: The role of dialogue
Pilkington, R. M., & Parker-Jones, C. (1996) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/0360-1315(96)00013-9 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Learning to Chat: Tutor participation in synchronous online chat
Burnett, C. (2003) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/1356251032000052474 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Computer Conferencing and the On-Line Classroom
Berge, Z. L. (1997) · International journal of educational telecommunications · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A Model for Thinking Critically about Ethical Issues
Allegretti, C. L., & Frederick, J. N. (1995) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top2201_14 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Weger, H., & Aakhus, M. A. (2003) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/00028533.2003.11821595 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Developing Critical Thinking through the Study of Paranormal Phenomena
Wesp, R. K., & Montgomery, K. (1998) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00986289809709714 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Morgan, W., & Beaumont, G. (2003) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Casado-Ledesma, L., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Mateos, M., Granado-Peinado, M., & Martín, E. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09548-3 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Litosseliti, L., Marttunen, M., Laurinen, L., & Salminen, T.
- Affiliations
- City, University of London (GB)
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Litosseliti, Lia
- Venue
- Education, Communication & Information
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-146
- ISSN
- 1463-631X (ISSN-L)
- 1470-6725
- OpenAlex
- W2010649516
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Education Communication and Information (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- collaborative argumentation, argumentation skills, high school students, face-to-face interaction, computer-based learning environments, synchronous chat, teacher support, argument quality, cross-national comparison, England, Finland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
